High Court Karnataka High Court

Mr. H.T. Malleshappa vs Smt Thimmamma on 6 June, 2011

Karnataka High Court
Mr. H.T. Malleshappa vs Smt Thimmamma on 6 June, 2011
Author: B.S.Patil
"J
_ 4 ,.

ALL ARE R/A HARUVANAHALIJ '7II,JIJAGE9
KASABA HOBLI, KADURTALUK,   
CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRECT.  R.ESPC'fNpI}EIS?'pI'S.i

>§>E=>i:

This Writ petition is filed under mtieles'?_28,. and 227 oi'...
the Constitution of lndia praying to dire.~:t"'th.eVv Senior __Ci"vii 
Judge, Kadur, to dispose the l_A:';NO».'-4:E'l?Ol7' thed'reiiei"~of i'iO11:'.
alienation of the suit schedule propeitties pending dispoeai of "

the original suit in 0.8.09/2011 X&7i"§.hi;i"'iv_ the tiVine'~liii1it:_asA this
Hon'ble Court deems reasonable.._on tl1e_fa<:ts and eireurnlstanees
of the ease and etc. '  ' ' °  

This writ petition eomin--<f:."on"'-»for pre~li.n1inary hearing
this day, the Court made the follo_wi1i.g::v 

 H ._Q__RDER.
1.

Petitioner lé:::f:3é€l*I_ili’ig dire:_eti.onto”the learned Senior Civil

Judge, Kadur, dispose of I.A.No.iV filed by him

under s_jrdéif ope iii O.S.No.9/2011.

2. Petitioner lrliasll’filedi:_ll..’ithe suit for partition and separate

possession of tliejointptamily properties. Along with the plaint,

»pe’ti.tioner.j:i.as~–.filed i.A.No.lV seeking an order of temporary

in}unetioifrestraining the defendants from alienating the suit

seheiiulep properties.

Notice was ordered on the said application. It is

‘.”§§TtI:3}11lti€Cl that defendants are served and represented. The

” -grievance of the petitioner is that although urgency is pieaded

__ 3 _
bringing to the notice of the Court that there is an attempt. made
by the defendants to dispose of the suit scheduleo.pro’pe_rties,
the application is not heard and disposed of resuiifiriigjinjiserious

prejudice to the plaintiff.

4. Having herd the learned counsel-for the fantloon u ‘

perusal of the materials on record,
by the petitioner for €Xp€dllil(_)QliSV’ disposal _
l.A.No.lV seeking temporary injnhotionppis.itist:._ai1di jegal. The
Court below has to on the said
application expe_ditvious1y~~ V fititionefs interest

will be affected’ . 1

5. lfienwee, petition ‘disposed of directing the Court
below toxhear the application as expeditiously as

possible atllany*rate._ period of one month from the date

of a copy..of.this order, if all the other defendants are

‘repi’esented:;«v_ no adverse order to the interest of the

respo~ndent{sj—-is}=passed, it is unnecessary to notify them.

Ségi’
EEEEGE

PES