Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr. Inder Kumar Gupta vs Office Of The Dy. Commissioner, … on 13 February, 2009

Central Information Commission
Mr. Inder Kumar Gupta vs Office Of The Dy. Commissioner, … on 13 February, 2009
                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                          Room No. 415, 4th Floor,
                        Block IV, Old JNU Campus,
                            New Delhi - 110067.
                           Tel: + 91 11 26161796

                                               Decision No. CIC /WB/C/2008/00754/SG/1664
                                                  Complaint No. CIC/WB/C/2008/00754/SG

Complainant                           :        Mr. Inder Kumar Gupta,
                                               B-72b, Ishwar Colony,
                                               Arjun Park, Nr. Nangali Dairy,
                                               Najafgarh, New Delhi - 110043

Respondent                                :    Chief Public Information Officer,
                                               ADM (N/W),
                                               Office of the Dy. Commissioner,
                                               Kanjawala, Delhi

Facts

arising from the complaint:

Mr. Inder Kumar Gupta, had filed a RTI application with Chief Public Information
Officer, ADM (N/W), Office of the Dy. Commissioner, Kanjawala, Delhi on 19/04/2008
asking for certain information. Since no reply was received within the mandated time of 30
days, he had filed a complaint under Section 18 to the Commission. The Commission issued
a notice to the PIO on 13/12/2008 asking him to supply the information and sought an
explanation for not furnishing the information within the mandated time.

The Commission has neither received a copy of the information sent to the
complainant, nor has it received any explanation from the PIO for not supplying the
information to the complainant. Therefore, the only presumption that can be derived is that
the PIO has deliberately and without any reasonable cause refused to give information as per
the provisions of the RTI Act. His failure to respond to the Commission’s notice shows that
he has no reasons for the refusal of information.

Decision:

The Complaint is allowed.

The PIO will send the complete information to the complainant before March 5, 2009.
The PIO’s action clearly amounts to denial of information without any reasons. The PIO is
therefore, asked to give a written submissions showing cause as to why penalty should not be
imposed and disciplinary action be recommended against him under Section 20 (1) of the RTI
Act
. He will give his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed
on him as mandated under Section 20 (1) before 10 March, 2009. He will also submit proof
of having given the information to the appellant.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
February 13, 2009.