Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr.K Harichandran vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 June, 2010

Central Information Commission
Mr.K Harichandran vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 June, 2010
                                        Central Information Commission


                                                                                                                    CIC/AD/A/2010/000555
                                                                                                                      Date: 2nd June, 2010



Name of the Appellant                   :                                        Mr. K Harishchandran


Name of the Public Authority        :                             Divisional Office, Trivandrum, 
                                                                                                      Southern Railway



Background

:

1. Mr. K Harishchandran from Kollam filed an RTI application on 09.03.2009 addressed to the PIO, 

Personnel   Branch,   Divisional   Office,   Southern   Railway   containing   eight   questions   seeking 

information  therein  regarding the  excess recovery of  Income Tax from Sri K.  Harishchandran 

(Applicant himself). The PIO in his letter dated 24.03.2009 requested the Applicant to submit an 

amount of Rs. 56 for  copies of the documents from Finance Ministry and denied the information 

regarding Mr. K Harishchandran under Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act2005. The PIO however 

gave an option to the Applicant to verify the details at the office, if it is not third party information. 

Not satisfied with the reply, the  Applicant filed the first appeal with the  Concerned Authority on 

25.04.2009 stating that redundant information was provided to him and also that  the information 

sought   was   not   personal   information.   On   not   receiving   any   reply   from   the   First   Appellate 

Authority,   the   Applicant     filed   a   second   appeal   before   the   Commission   requesting   the 

Commission to direct the Public Authority to provide the information.

2. The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit  scheduled the hearing for  2nd June, 2010.

3. Mr. Govinda Karnavar, Sr. DPO & PIO, Mr. Ashok Kumar ADRM, The Appellate Authority and Mr. 

P.G. Chandran represented the Public Authority and were heard through video conferencing. 

4. The Appellant was present during the hearing and was also heard through video conferencing.

Decision:

5. The Respondent submitted that initially the information was not provided to Mr. Harichandran 

because it was thought that the Appellant was seeking third party’ information. However later 

when it came to be known that the information being sought  pertains to the Appellant himself, a 

decision was taken to furnish complete information.   The Appellant was invited to the office to 

collect the information. With regard to further clarification related to Income Tax required by the 

Appellant the Commission directs the PIO to give a personal hearing to the Appellant  within 10 

days of the receipt of this order and provide the required clarification. 

6. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

                                                                                                                          (Annapurna Dixit)
                                                                                               Information Commissioner 

Authenticated True Copy to:

 

(G. Subramanian)
Deputy Registrar

Cc:

1. Mr. K Harichandran
Sree Ragam, M G Nagar­86/A
Kilikollor, PO, Kollam

2. The Public Information Officer
DRM’s Office, Personnel Branch
Southern Railway, Salem­ 636005

3. The Appellate Authority
DRMs Office, Personnel Branch
Southern Railway,
Salem­ 636005

4. Officer In­Charge, NIC

5. Press E Group, CIC