IOURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT_.0:"'-:KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT EN EH3 HIEH 3933: GE KARxnTnKA,_g$3G$£¢R$ wag HDN'ELE MR. Jssrifig1fl;x.H%§a&mHB%§Yaés, DRTED THIS THE 29" say SF fifi?T3$fié'XTCT. 3aEcm£"*«tf £RIKINL Pgrzfrsx fickiezéxéaéé' EEOEIY 1 K Mg K 3 CfiIHHfi3WEfi¥"? ,_ ._, ; Sflfé EJWE K SSVH-'S$fi.MYAP.FA 7 *7' A5Efi~A3auT;49:2EaRs"C;_' f §a;15E;~:.3;aaa, 1:1 C3533 §fi§§fiR*§?DUTg"2V'_"T ,3 3a§6&gcRE'5fi¢v$?i"' 3 . PETITIDNER TTfig]i§§Q$REQBHANB, Anv.§ f'm£a¥ 3 sxzvaanax vv_ _*$fQ'mE V 5 snsaxxvasn IYEflGAR *. gas? $9.3, Mflflfibnxfil RQAB 'z:.?Hn5E, MQTRAM R935 _f'm5ua~635 19% a.KR3SH&A5IR: EISTRECT "maninaxknu HESS AT! '§'53KEI'3 !'IQ.H C9139 BEPRRWEET FRI E5.L3§§I3}1%R.R}!E FRSTENER LI?-EITEB EKRITE, HQSSR - 635 3.99 }'»"_3"--;IS'E-§W}'=§J§ILF.E BISTRICT '§'?s}§I iaiiiéfizfifl . .. . RESPONDENT
‘£21!’
THIS CR£.PET1TI$H I8 Flbfifl u!s,§a: cé;§;¢ BY
‘}”‘E’3’E .Kf3VQC.RT E 33533. THE PETK TI SEEP. = 4’2″”-‘.
3???? ELK CQUR’? HR’? 33 $533555 TQ 33$ “5′.}4RU}§«E.
E13′. §. 43 . ZC!€3$ PASSEE BY THE XI? ,= _ Bf
:5 CC.fifi.2fi505fQ6, ~W
*n=-:15 c:5.z:-msraz..,* .;>s*:*x*é’:r_;’.§§; z?e:m
P23351331 53?}, THI5 THE ‘§’I’TK
Fasanawzma: ‘
I:a._ ‘t_hi3_’ ” p t}:;aVV” yetitixrsnexz has
gezayefi-.31″ ‘ vV_¢:*»’1.’:¥ie;::’ dated 9 .4 . 2008
in… the applicatian
£:£:V.?;a:.i: uncle: Saction 91. of
» V$;§étitianar filad CC.Na.2fi5Q5!2G96
“a’gé.£i2:.;£§:–?: 1= t%:e respondents for the cxffance
‘a2.,3;.”»a,:g%:i& tea have baen coemtitteezi under Secztian
AA ‘ “§,A38H csf thg Hagotiable Inatrumants act. After
cmmpimtiori csf the evidence $21 the aside of the
IOURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURI.€)F_; KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1
§etitianm:;. that mattar was gcstzed far
azgumenta. At that atage, the respendent
filefi an ayplisaticsn ‘£7£fld33£ Section 91 of the
t’.’;’r.P..,C.. ta: aunman ctextain dscumenta, whiah
xa\..
“SOUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURIAOE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA VIIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1
4. Ear the raasans stated abgve, the
yatitioa ia hareby refiacteé with g éiiécticn
ta the trial Ccuzt ta axgedita fifiéggfitféfkaa
ex§e§itimua2y as poasibié anfi in afiy_e?éut uni ‘
latér than 3 manths f3$2E§é d@;§x¢fC£efiéiptA
afi capy at this ardex;FC