High Court Karnataka High Court

Mr Khan Umar Akthar Hussain vs State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Mr Khan Umar Akthar Hussain vs State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2009
Author: K.Bhakthavatsala


vmwwwwmmm wrn m’tm”‘Ia:mI2¥Mr’u«m”1Iu.m'”« wmmvnwwzo mwmmmemw mutant nauuv¢5:r-mu::«~9aww,$”‘u~ amnwnm mm

4. Since the alleged offences are triab;g by

a Magistrate, it is far the prosecution ta prfiye

its case in the trial. The apprahen3i§fi”‘fif}:fihaffi

prnsecution that the petitieggr wouba fl§é:!:efi’~fl

the caurt uf juatice ccu1dK bg__§a£l at vfesti §y

imposing agpragriate conditiefla ‘while gefilar§ifig:*

the patiionax on bail.

5. In the xesuifi} pgtitiéfigfi is enlarged on
bail subjact=V ta ~”fn;filimé§t A¢f fallowing

canditions;i_ f 5.’

ay”?a§ifii5fiax”shafi1’§zauta a personal band
7; far é gag §£ fi3g2s,eoax- with one lncal

surety for likgsum ta ihaisatisfaetian af

gag Trig; ccurt.””

fie sha@i_i ¢a$fi3it cash security af

3Vfia_ shail 3§rk3 his attandanca an every

u” $finday;Lbatwéan 9 a.m. to ID a.m. in

< 'Shi§ajin§§ar 9.3., until the disposal of

"§h@H¢ase.

:”@ H§ shall net tamper with the grasecutian

“witnesses.

Va-J!!! %maVcd”Nw’£’mw Wu mmwmwwwwmmuwwm wetsvtwommmzt ‘4mr”\«l!”%_fi7t”m?2 mo» 0″h-Je'”*E.fll’!4|IWJ9′”\HI.aV”*nu:*t.:s”‘\\m, gmnwmnm

k/

‘-WI’ Iwtunmurmvrmnwrm anwrntu WWWWE \Jf’K” Wwwflflwflififlfih flak??? fiyfififixgfifi

9}

f}

g)

He shall cc-cyerate with.’the pv1ice_ to

agprahand tha abscanding accused.

Bk shall attend the court ragu1a§i§; f1j q L

HE shall not leave;”” Safi§%h3m;u”w

Cityffiangalara Ruraia ni$fi£ig£ V§it§9fit

grist pexmi:aiun,’ . V V H V
1-pa shall file an .§;f:ic2avi£”m£:Li;sfii§ng the
cnrrect addféss wfi§@§ §a w§uld Eéwétaying

in Bangalare. 5 ”