BEFORE 2 i
THE HON'BLE MR.JU:§TIc.E CR x %
Q31. M,._,,1N,,,A,; 13. 13m, ,gI,oN
%
S/0 lat3'K;"J,S1ji2bai;-.ah"
Aged 55 " ' «_
Resitiing at Nt3;:f?~50- . _
8"'?Cross;
II Black,
Bangalore --- 32 & x ...PE'l'I'I'ION'ER
_; " {B3} Gowda
Advs)
'uMr;--1:)..Is2t?isIn1appa
'Sits Eats Dfida....'='°*1
* kTuR/at No.100/1
v 103* Cross, Govindamjnagar
'Bangalore - 40. .._.RESPONDEN'I'
This mg? is filed unda Section 397
401 Cr.PC prafying
se aside the '
to
sentence dated 30.08.2004 in CC..No.17?33'i2003 mg-no
M
file of the xxn AQM. _I1d. %.is.;eI.-.0, WW
Judge, Bangalore and judgtnent dated '24.0'4r_2005 "in
Crl.A.No.9G2f-2664 on the, fiic of Ens F'Ios§:jing' ()')fI'i&:e1':,"'o.
Fast Track Court-IX, City". V
This CrI.RP onforsgdinissionthis day. the
Court mad" the foi1oW'if1gf:= V_ 3 * --.
Re"po'r1d'"n" are present. An
appl_ioaI:io n V_is.:fi1cAd=_si'J1i:der Section 320(6) mad with
482 Section 147 of the Negotiable
Execution is adxnittod before: the
G.:_:_I_i_rL v.The:. mid mfiuon reads as foll'"u'v's:
"It is humbly subxnittcxj 9...
follows:
1. "he petitioner has filed the
abo"v*e I'fi'\ii'i'fi petition chaiienging the
ju..gmmt and mtcxmice dated
b the learned e e_ea1ire%;k
iv
S.-»
.%
we
.><
Crl.A.No.902/2OQf1"dated 24.e4.2ooe.
negotiable
T _.'j11et:i*@er1is*Aet'inconnection with the
' "the eheque which he had
4' issued fiiioijr of the respondent
learned Trial Judge was
_ plee§sed—-««to sentence the petitioner’ to
fine of Rs.2,21,000/- (Rupees Two
awarded as compensation to be paid to
a/
Bangalore ” ~..g1t A ‘ ‘
4
the respondent under Section ~
11.. 11 f1
\J1′.l.”.\..»-.
3. It is
at the intervention oi’
and friends of the ponies’ also
the respes_tive’.w* . i the
sides, new ” {)etitione1′ and
respondent*– if haii’e_ ea 111611′
A ‘.45.; I-II ‘ as-‘v.n’u.r.u.V-ma
«««« .. Zijaetiiioner to pay a sum
it – (Rupees One Lakh
. and Five Thousand only)
” and final settlement of all
1 the and dues in respect of the
matter of this revision petition
the respondent has also agreed to
it receive the said amount as fuii and
u……1 …. 1………… -9 .. …I..: .. ..
1 ucfucmucllt Ul. an an ‘u:u”1’in uuu
due finm the mtjfinner in re m..n’r hi’
the dishonour cheque.
4. It is further submitted that
the petitioner has already deposited a
sum of Rs.1.i0.C)0t7- (Rupees One
(1
‘LI
5
-0 as 4
aim and ‘Ten Thousand Ollljfi’ A’
mm Tr-*-‘ urstiant to ‘theT_er’de1″_sV
.1’ ..his uonhie want ‘1” also that or
the – :,_t Apmllaue A we
petitioner hereiz, “consent
authorize the to
the said Court.
Further, the a sum of: Sixty Five _ in before this
eteknozfme and the receipt of
” – A. _. respondent is hereby
‘sekgnewiedgc an’ confirmed. As
L
5. It is further submitted that
1′ of the said settlement between
“”1e “srfies, the partie hereby confirm
that they h-ve no ciaim against each
ot__..r wh_.t.sower and that therefore,
the parties 11…. shy %k the idtid
indulgence of this Hon’b1e Gou.rt. m
pleased to permit them to compound
the above case in the foregoing terms
2/
6
and further be pleased to set asidc. ”
conviction and by £110.
WHEREFQ1_§E;_ it is» 0
prayed .A Court -be
pleased to and
Sthe oflcnoe
__ ‘V In – Negotiable
No.1’7738/2003
%%%% in theiiieamed xxn Addl.
‘l’_-Ec-g–Vge-‘-:–A’. so£I;”””#flt’- asid tn» j”dg’ru”*’t an
2ccn_V ii(Vition datcd 3f_L..8….-004 ms in
._ . phe ‘vcasc and its oon_fi_r1_n_.._.-…- by
_ learned Fast Track Judge-IX,
Bongalore City in Cr1.A.No.902/2004
‘ ‘v””datied 24.04.2006, in the interest of
justice and equity.”
This Criminal Revision Petition is allowed in
terms of the petition filed under S¢:x.=t1_n 320$.) mad
with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and “odor Section 147 of
1/
7
the Negotiable Intruments Act. In
320(8) of Cr.P.C. compounding”” j x
acquittal of the petitioner,