\V J_D:%%j%
IN THE HIGH comm" OF KARNATAKA AT ~ %
DATED THIS THE 15'-"3 DAY 2é>§::3:k«k L
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTiG !§VA¢NAi§3D 3~zRm:,nnY
HOUSE RENT REVISI(§»}sIQ1PETImTjIf.E )35Jfi:i9§i<;g_8_2' {)F'2oo7 (EVE)
BETWEEN:
Mr. Mohamm6d;"53'}::¥'i5ars:=._
S./0 K.T.Abd.uiKha1de:'r_ " '
Pmprietur: Sapnaii_S§aiufiérs_V ._ V'
No.34z9,4s"*[Cxfi»?s
Shanlhinagar, . I ?ETITIONER
(By Shri. Advocate)
3{0"R. V. _Pfannti2an_ii'¥I3PPa
No. 34x9, s*"cm.«;s
Sha:§t!;i;1agar,_;BaAngalore-27 RESPONDENT
_ .A zHc:;iia and Huila, Advocates)
,’._g twmtt
This Hausa Rent Revision Petition is flied under Section 46
:9I”Kamalaka Rent Act against the Judgement and Order dated
17.3.2067 passed in HRC. No. 100393003 an fhe file of the XV
g
Additional Small Causes Iudgu, Mayohail
(SCCH-19), allowing the: petition filed under V’ 9»
Karnataka Rent/£91, 1999.
This House Rent Revision ‘E?g§E§1ion wming i-‘prVvHcaring V
this day, the Court made a2;e%%ru1:uw;ng;Ag ~ %
&afi?ER} f!
During:.i§2;3v p¢;g.:.;m:,;;9rus.ss re-§£i;:i¢;;z pgm, which is tired
by the order of eviction, there is a
sc£llc:neni émi ve:4i ‘at. iandlord and icnani, whereby it
V is ag1j¢§:{f’i§1alt}v1e”,ttg§iii§onf§r-tenant wouid cuniinuc in uctmpy the
.vV§§”«-icnang an payment of the: enhanced rent of
mm». igom. and it is 3139 agreed that an miditiesnal
% ;t:fun;fi2hf1¢% :;V1.d’v£;ncc deposit of Rs. 1 .00 Mb would be paid and the
érangcmeai would be mduccd to a furrna} dved to be
_ by the paréics.
Recording this submission and alsu nx:ordi1c-gi’
of the landlord and lbs tenant in Ci}trr1, ‘the ‘
alluwed. The order of the Elia} cqurt is.»’ sr:_£ –. , J, n
‘»
{IV