Mr Mukthar vs Teh Special Tahasildar on 25 February, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  &  %

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY   '  T
THE HON"BLE MR. JUSTIC1: Bmaajnnv
WRIT PETITION;:}§iii,.3(i'5;'_;§_§:2£}%§§»'{.KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:       i   

1. Mr. Muk£har,§'--§9      "" H
S;/0 Mr. S. K.   "

2. Ms.S1i'2¥1if§ii'a::;ri§;:a.~a'V§3§:gs§::i:. 'V   %
'?'O years, Wise. Mr.'  

Both  2:1 fi&§.5 V ' '
S 5? I, Strgaet, seppiugs
R{3f'¢'1(g:.C!_'iiSS_   ..... <4 .

% k%    Eia;i'gaIéi:f$-5§§Q._ 091  PETFFIONERS

 Advocate)

_  " 'I}.V»'i'hc..Spc.xV:siai Tahaséldar
A   Baagéglore North (Addificmal)
..   Ytxlaharika Town
   wfléxnylore

  "  Tbs: Deputy Cufizmissiuncr

Enforcement Direcmrate (FERA)

8



2

£5 9?}, SB} Rtmd, Behind India

Garage, BangaIore~560 001    %

(By Shri. R. Kumar, High Court Govufirxrntznt     

flfllrtikt

This Writ Ptziitiun is' filed undۤ:aAri.icles 226 of [ha
Canstitutien of India pzuying to ;dec_lm._.%x"2nv::xure A the demand
notice iasssucd by rcspumiciit 11o.lL__¢§2a.1}miV';.9§2008 iassutnd by the
respondent no.1 as one V.vi:o1a;fi<m' the principies of

namra! justice and faezxce §a’t’2.aw_;f V’

This Wfii Qzdtzrs this day, the: Court
made the t'<3li:3~;.v.tiz1g::'}~_; ' ~

The prciiminary' hearing.

" " A " petitioner is penrniticad to withdraw the

m£iii_r2n 'Imt'

Sd/-v
Judge