1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 31") DAY OF FEBRUARY 2009
BEFORE
THEHON'BLE MRJUSTICES. ABDUL N.4zEE:z* T T
WRIrPEr1rI0NN0.11a22/20'?fie"-'--"' " f T T
Between:
Sfoiate Rama, "
Aged about 50 years; V '
Rfa No.22, 5"" Mam, 5".*T T
B. Chandrappa Nagar,-ii_B_;{}. Road, ._ "
Banga1m'e~55G~O30.j. .
V 3 Petitioner.
(By Sri M. Nmfayafi Bfia;tt.,ffALv;.f§§rv3fii':3__'Si1bbarao &. C0. Advs.)
And:
B.atfga1o{re WatéfASu;3plyvand I
., ASéi€erég¢ Boayd, 1" Floor,
' Bhzvam, Bangalore-9,
, S/o Peddégrangaiall,
V Aged aimut 54 years,
" Wdrlginzg as Sanitaly Mestary, East 2,
>Su1~.:Division, BWSSB, 10"' Main,
Lndiranagar Defence Colony,
T * Bangalore - 38.
3 Mr. Lakshmaiah,
SE0 Nagappa,
Agedaboutfifl years,
Working as Sanitary Mestary, T j;
BWSSB, No.4, Central Water Supply, A'
Sub Division, VV Puram, ' . . '
Bangalore - 4.
4 Additional Chief Engineer (M)-1;" -- 2
& Chairman of Screening COn1li--tIift§:9,\ "
Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Beard, -.
BangaIor--9.__
5 1.1». Shanlcer"; »
sic late Pedc1a:m;_
Aged.abet:t§¥'F;yeaté;-- " _ .
New ivworicing 'es VSa_:1ita1y..Overeeai's,
BWSSB, No.3, _Sen"ri:;e'eSt3i--imi,_.
Magad1"I2/Iain Road. ,.
Bangalore,"and" V
R/e' BWSSB Qua1'tef,
E'etige!9re¢23. ..... ' ....Respondents.
tsfiis; vBhtai%a:ji’~~!§hankar Rao, Adv. for R1 & R4
teat), Adv. for R2 & R3)
_ AA Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the
” Ctmstitntitm, fxraying to direct the 1′ respondent to consider the
dated 5.5.2003, 11.7.2006 and 3.8.2006″
-reetpeétiveiy, etc.
3
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’
Group this day, the Couit made the following:
Q1
Petitioner has been workm’ g as a {hr-[A ‘
Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage (forshort
the first respondent he:-ein.’Sirr1ilerly, ‘N.os.2′,i’3 ~¢,nq..
were also working as Sanitary it is the
ease of the petitionerpttlmitj 3 are
juniors to him, they of Sanitary
Overseers as i”A”Vo:’ijV27.3.20O3. During
the pendency V__’5°’.’ respondent, who was
junior to the to the post of Sanitary
as ‘G’ 2.2.2007. It is
was senior to them and the
‘jp-‘t1t1_ and the private respondents are
the ;ouVg,ht to have promoted the petitioner to the next
‘iflierefore, petitioner has filed representations to the
asgrer Annexures ‘E1’ and ‘E2’ on 5.5.2003, 11.7.2005
it
-.
‘ and 3.8.2006 respectiveiy to consider his case for promotion ”
next higher post of Sanitary Overseer. Since
representations have not been considered byflthe ii,
has filed this writ petition for a theifirst M
respondent to consider the same. He has
to the first respondent-Board to to
the next cadre of date on
which his juniors i.e. and
for of other it M
2. The of objections.
3. I have heaiziiithe Cotmsel for the parties.
«t. of the petitioner that he is senior to
5 in the post of Sanitary Maistxy and that
and” Nos.2, 3 and 5 have the similar
~ It is fimher contendtil that though respondent Nos.2
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
T
‘I”’39e ” 7
Bh/NI/322009
I -».w…….u..,……..,x_……..~.