High Court Karnataka High Court

Mr Nena Lal vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 30 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Mr Nena Lal vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 30 April, 2009
Author: H N Das
mm-«urn: wsrwx wtI"'mImB'"&

 wwafnm W Wmmmm mmm Wm" W mmmam Hm: mum as mamsmem mm mam' M mmmmm Hmm

IN THE HIGH CCBURT DP' KARHATAKA AT BIKNGALORE

mmn ms Tm saw my 01? APRIL  

BEFORE

Tm HQIFBLE ma. JUSTICE    

BETWEEH :

manna IA}.  %  
amsm mnmawzx     %  .    
AGEDABOU'T'54YEARS   
rvzmmmc; M HCL113-B " V
mmnzmmmmn . - _  - 
REPRESEfl*1'I?21'}"}3Y7GPA"H:C3_I£EJ,ER' 

  »  «_    ..pm'rnoz~m2
13?' $£21:i%:  sHE.'m', Am.)

.._.--.._.---on

1.

st:.4.*r%E<:ér= "

m;§1a:Es;§;z4TE13Bff HES Pamcnnm

– _ sE’CR’E”TARY. Dnmmzm op REVERUE

~ ‘SC}’£I_IJI’iA

our.

2. mxmwm
mzmm smcm

_L ‘ H.R.Si’._1_{E3’ARE, .:.c.Rmn
‘ 092

= % xxvazszmn 3? rrs
kcommsxozma.

kj g *3; ms commwsm

BANQKLORE I}EVE£»OPlENT gz:rv., ma 1:2-2)

§?L1~._.2\,.

R N0.1.3_.541 c?§E13€>¢39 tm-EmJ%

wr-1

9 “WM Mr nnnlvfiaflmfl MJMH EUUKT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARWfi?flKfi §”‘§!GH {ZUUQT Q? KARNAIAKA E-1&6!-{ C

3% “WIT PETITEOH 3 FREE UNDER Ai?I’IC3LE$__ 326
A139 227 OF THE CO ON OF R3338, FRfiLY}2~I’€§”–1’D
I3E'(3I.&RE “i’I*IA’I’ ‘I’fiE AGTIDN GR ‘THE 12¢

mvms T0 AGQUIRE Tim mm 013* THE p:3:;fr3f;*1*:§m;1zg
mmowr FEJLLQWING: mm xwncxcmss 0? Lawgg }=II;:”§§£L’£*._\_ ‘
Amrrxmmr, ILLEGALAHI3 vxamfivs r;»% %*
mama Tm DAY, THE cougr HADE ‘TE-IE A ‘L

:2 3 Q _

Thc wtitioner of 12
g’Lmtas cf land an Kaval
Village, Haw, North mm.
The land are new
land. mapite thn
the rmpanciemm are
mnmumg J activity and thercfam thc

Cami.

E’ they am 63% to carmider the
mpmmmzsan datmi 15.3.2933 in
with 2m and as apaaitiausxy aa pmibxe
‘4 xanclinany evmt, not lflthan onewaekfmztzx the dam

¢:>f rmm of acaopy cxf thimrdmn

74″/hf’

;I1icige.. j:

3
3 With the above cbaeawratian, this writ petifion
E dhpoaed ail 9T
VGR

W §§ §.§§m§ 3 E33 x@§ §<§§.§ § Sag $3.3 §§§§§ $3 §§g fiaifi §§§,§§ E égm :