In the Central Information Commission
at
New Delhi
File No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001899
CIC/AD/A/2011/001900
Date of Hearing : October 4, 2011
Date of Decision : October 4, 2011
Parties:
Applicant
Shri Rajeev Sharma
H.No.E/358(A)
Mandir Marg
Chhajjupur
Shahdara
Delhi 110 032
The Applicant was present during the hearing.
Respondents
Directorate of Education (CIC/AD/A/2011/001899)
O/o DDE(NWA)
BLBlock, Shalimar Bagh
Delhi
Represented by : Ms.Neena Kumar, PIO who inadvertently marked her attendance in case
No.CIC/AD/A/2011/001898
Directorate of Education (CIC/AD/A/2011/001900)
O/o DDE(East)
Anand Vihar
New Delhi
Represented by : Ms.Laxmi Avasthy, ADE
Shri Aryendu Ambesh, Gr.II H/C
Shri Tarun Giri, Supdt.
Information Commissioner : Mrs. Annapurna Dixit
___________________________________________________________________
In the Central Information Commission
at
New Delhi
File No: CIC/AD/A/2011/001899
CIC/AD/A/2011/001900
ORDER
Background
CIC/AD/A/2011/001899
1. The Applicant filed an RTI Application dt.10.5.11 with the PIO, DDE(NWA) seeking information
against seven points with regard to Govt. Coed S.S.School, Singhu, Delhi. The Dy. Education
Officer, ZoneIX replied on 24.5.11 enclosing the information received from the Principal of the
School. Not satisfied with the reply, the Applicant filed an appeal dt.21.6.11 with the Appellate
Authority. Dr.Sunita S.Kaushik, Appellate Authority replied on 5.7.11 directing the PIO to provide
complete information and also to accord permission to the Applicant to inspect the school. In
compliance to the order of the Appellate Authority, PIO replied on 27.7.11. Being aggrieved with the
reply, the Applicant filed a second appeal dt.4.8.11 before CIC.
CIC/AD/A/2011/001900
2. The Applicant filed an RTI Application dt.10.5.11 with the PIO, DDE(East) seeking information against
seven points with regard to GSBV School, Shakarpur, Delhi. Ms.Neelam Verma, PIO replied on
3.6.11 stating that the required information received from the concerned school is in 66 pages and
requesting the Applicant to collect the information on 9.6.11 after paying the requisite fee (@ Rs.2/
per page). Not satisfied with the information, the Applicant filed an appeal dt.21.6.11 with the
Appellate Authority. Ms.Neelam Verma, Appellate Authority replied on 15.7.11 directing the PIO to
provide revised information against points 6 and 7 within one week’s time. Being aggrieved with the
reply, the Applicant filed a second apeal dt.4.8.11 before CIC.
Decision
3. The Appellant submitted that he is satisfied with the information provided in both the cases.
4. In view of the above, appeals are considered as WITHDRAWN by the Appellant and the cases
directed to be closed.
(Annapurna Dixit)
Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy
(G.Subramanian)
Deputy Registrar
Cc:
1. Shri Rajeev Sharma
H.No.E/358(A)
Mandir Marg
Chhajjupur
Shahdara
Delhi 110 032
2. The Public Information Officer
Directorate of Education
O/o DDE(NWA)
BLBlock, Shalimar Bagh
Delhi
3. The Public information Officer
Directorate of Education
O/o DDE(East)
Anand Vihar
New Delhi
4. The Appellate Authority
O/o Regional Director of Education (north)
G.Coed, S.V.Building
F/U Block, Pitampura
Delhi 110 034
5. The Appellate Authority
O/o Regional Director of Education (East)
SBV Building
Rani Garden
Delhi
6. Officer in charge, NIC