Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr. Rajiv Kumar vs Mcd on 21 February, 2009

Central Information Commission
Mr. Rajiv Kumar vs Mcd on 21 February, 2009
                       CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                              Room No. 415, 4th Floor,
                            Block IV, Old JNU Campus,
                                New Delhi - 110067.
                               Tel : + 91 11 26161796

                                                         Decision No. CIC /WB/C/2007/00566/SG/1891
                                                            Complaint No. CIC/WB/C/2007/00566/SG

Complainant                                :         Mr. Rajiv Kumar,
                                                     F-186, New Seema Puri
                                                     New Delhi-110095

Respondent                                  :        Public Information Officer,
                                                     Director (Primary Education)
                                                     MCD, Kashmiri Gate, Delhi-110092

Facts

arising from the Complaint:

Mr. Rajiv Kumar had filed a RTI application with the PIO, Director (Primary Education),
MCD, Kashmiri Gate, Delhi on 06/09/2007 asking for certain information. Since no reply was
received within the mandated time of 30 days, he had filed a complaint under Section 18 to the
Commission. The Commission issued a notice to the PIO on 03/01/2009 asking him to supply
the information and sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within the
mandated time.

The Commission has neither received a copy of the information sent to the complainant,
nor has it received any explanation from the PIO for not supplying the information to the
complainant. Therefore, the only presumption that can be derived is that the PIO has deliberately
and without any reasonable cause refused to give information as per the provisions of the RTI
Act. His failure to respond to the Commission’s notice shows that he has no reasons for the
refusal of information.

Decision:

The Complaint is allowed.

The PIO will send the complete information to the complainant before March 18, 2009.
The PIO’s action clearly amounts to denial of information without any reasons. The PIO is
therefore, asked to submit a written explanation showing cause as to why penalty should not be
imposed and disciplinary action be recommended against him under Section 20 (1) & (2) of the
RTI Act before March 23, 2009.

If the information has already been supplied to the complainant, furnish a copy of the
same to the Commission with your written submission.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
February 21, 2009.

For any further communication quote the decision no. given at the top.