Posted On by &filed under Central Information Commission, Judgements.


Central Information Commission
Mr.Sanjiv Chaturvedi vs Ministry Of Environment And … on 14 September, 2011
                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                    Club Building (Near Post Office)
                  Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                         Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                      Decision No. CIC/AD/C/2011/001121/SG/14590
                                          Complaint No. CIC/AD/C/2011/001121/SG


Complainant                      :        Mr. Sanjiv Chaturvedi
                                          C/o Mr. Kuldip Tiwari
                                          House No.817, Sector-25
                                          Panchkula, Haryana


Respondent                       :        Public Information Officer
                                          Ministry of Environment & Forests
                                          CGO Complex, Paryavaran Bhawan
                                          Lodi Road, New Delhi-110003



Facts

arising from the Complaint:

Mr. Sanjiv Chaturvedi had filed a RTI application with the Respondent PIO on
16/03/2011 asking for certain information. However on not having received the
information within the mandated time, the Complainant filed a complaint under Section
18 of the RTI Act with the Commission. On this basis, the Commission issued a notice to
the Respondent on 09/07/2011 with a direction to provide the information to the
Complainant and further sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within
the mandated time.

The Commission has neither received a copy of the information sent to the
Complainant, nor has it received any explanation from the PIO for not supplying the
information to the Complainant. Therefore, the only presumption that can be made is that
the PIO has deliberately and without any reasonable cause refused to give information as
per the provisions of the RTI Act. Failure on the part of the PIO to respond to the
Commission’s notice shows that there is no reasonable cause for the refusal of
information.

Decision:

The Complaint is allowed.

In view of the aforesaid, the PIO is hereby directed to provide the complete
information in regard to the RTI Application dated 16/03/2011 to the Complainant before
04/10/2011 with a copy to the Commission. From the facts before the Commission, it
appears that you have not provided the correct and complete information within the
mandated time and has failed to comply with the provisions of the RTI Act. The delay
and inaction on the PIO’s part in providing the information amounts to willful
disobedience of the Commission’s direction as well and also raises a reasonable doubt
that the denial of information may be malafide.

The PIO is hereby directed to send his written submissions to the Commission
before 10/10/2011 to show cause why penalty should not be imposed and disciplinary
action be not recommended against him under Section 20 (1) and (2) of the RTI Act. If
the information has already been supplied to the complainant, send a copy of the same to
the Commission with your written submissions, and also copy of proof of seeking
assistance from other person(s), if any.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this order will be provided free of cost as per section 7(6) of RTI, Act, 2005.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
14 September 2011

Encl: RTI Application dated 16/03/2011

(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(SP)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

107 queries in 0.175 seconds.