IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.»
DATEB mxs THE 28*" my OF ocrosep, 2:e1¢&»kkkOO
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE MOHAIQ4SH'AN9rA'N_}\A${3¥'JbVARA
wan PETITION NO.I7539/251-(5:(st-SA/\?¥§'E'§§)«--v
BETWEEN:
Sréram Sudheer -. V O
Aged 37 years
S/o .Sathyana rayan. V Bad r=i_
R/at.1007,1_0?"'--..F|GO§3'r_-.'_ ~ ;
Burjuman Résidéncé . "
Dubai, UAE.
Also at . . v
No.913, Leve|-9 ' _ ' ._
Barton Cer1"tr_e%,M M.G._Ro.ae$_"".L.
Ban9amre~1 .. PETITIONER
' «gay An/ire-d Kar%fat"'4' 'ALMT Legal, Advs.,)
AN O
1. §3as?5pO?;3a*i;: Officer
86' feet Road, 8"' Block
Koramangala
" {3a_nga'|ore--95
2. The Joint Secretary (CW) and (CPO)
Ministry of External Affairs
Patiala House
New Delhi .. REsi9oNo_E_-ti.i*s'Aj' i.
(By Sri Kalyan Basavaraj, ASG)
This writ petition is riiediiaiiisitiyer Aiticies 327%
of the Constitution of India,Vi4i"'~«i.firaying""to:i'ciuaVsh the
impugned order passevdiicby vide
Annextire-D for impouridinci;_t'he>pjet'itioneVr_fs'passport, etc.
This writ;_"p'et;ition o'n:'io.'i"nreiiminary hearing,
this day thei'Coti_i=t:"rria.de as foi__|Ciwi'ng:V_-'
%%%% ii i9t._m D R
SriA'«i<VVZa'-lyai'. med Assistant Solicitor
General take's..riotwice i'-orvrespondents.
petitioner has sought for a direction to
Hitxi’it°lresp.onde.nt No.2 to decide the appeal fiied by the
— oetiiitioner, on merits at an eariy date.
i/5
-3-
3. The document at Annexure–E reveals that the
petitioner has fiied appeai questioning the impoi.in.d:’ifnb_g~..VV
of petitioner’s passport before the second
on 18.1.2010. According to the petit–i–one’_r,V”not–‘I.e’iien’_jia
notice is issued to the petitioner to”hea.ringi.:’of;”:
the appeal. Petitioner wants”*vi.the ap.pea’i*i.toi_:ldeiheagrd
on merits at an eafri~,r’_ d_afé.’fp-evcauselivof”certain
urgency.
4. eieisreofidernt rim-i2. “3_hi?_’U’.d» have heard the
aPl3eal Va’t”‘ar1.”.§.~§rlA:;l/§i~:datié-.V”‘V’S«o’civ.wii«r.’iatters should not be
delayed… if the: heard at an eariy date
hardship w’E”i~i _Vbe.fi’:aAu_sed”: to the petitioner. Hence,
fiiedi Vthe”‘Detitioner on 18.1.2010 needs to
be ‘heard:~«evarlVy..:_i.~Hence, the following order made:–
.. Writ petition is disposed of with a direction
;_’t’oV”Respondent No.2 to decide the appeal of the
V3
W4-
petitioner as early as possible, but not later than the
outer limit of two months from the date of receji’p.tfy:§f~V.vv
thés order.
*c:k/nk-- tb