Mr.Vijay Kumar vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 June, 2011

0
44
Central Information Commission
Mr.Vijay Kumar vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 June, 2011
                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                            Club Building (Near Post Office)
                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                               Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/001162/13099
                                                                       Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/001162

Relevant Facts

emerging from the Appeal

Appellant : Mr. Vijay Kumar Yadav
B-199, Gall No. 06, Prem Nagar- II ,
Savitri Katariya Road, Kirari Suleman Nagar
Delhi – 11004

Respondent : Mr. R. C. Antil
Public Information Officer & SDM(Election)
Election Department,
SDM (Election) North West,
Kanjhawala, Delhi – 81

RTI application filed on : 18/10/2010
PIO replied : 27/10/2010
First appeal filed on : 29/11/2010
First Appellate Authority order : 26/12/2010
Second Appeal received on : 03/03/2011

S.No Information sought by the appellant Reply of the PIO

2. Provide information about all the concerned officers, their There are 3 temporary and 3
address, phone no. post and field work in the EPIC Centre permanent workers in the Kirari
AC 9, Kirari. How many permanent workers are there and Legislature. Their phone no. is :
how many are working on contact base? 25952545

4. How many applications have been submitted at this EPIC Total 5789 forms have been
centre in the last six months (1 November 2009 to 30 April received out of which 5499
2010)Give details in the following manner : have been accepted and 290

a) Date of application have been rejected. There are no

b) Name & address of the applicant and PS No. pending forms.

c) Date of completion of application i.e. date on
which the name was entered on the voter list and
the date of issue of voter ICard.

d) Also give details of the rejected or pending
applications

5. Allow for the inspection of all the application letters of the There is no provision for
applications submitted in the last 6 months. Inform about inspection by any outsider.
the date and time for inspection

6. Provide the directions and order issued for the applicants in Not related to this office
the EPIC Centre or the copy of the Citizen Charter or
provide detailed description of the laws

8. As per departmental orders within how many days of the The name comes on the voter
submission of application in the EPIC Centre, the name list in 21 days all the documents
goes on to the voter list and the voter I card is prepared. attached by the applicant are
Who is the officer-in-charge for inspection of the complete. After this the
application till the making of Voter I-Card. Give details. applicant has to contact the
What punishment is prescribed for any deficiency in the office for EPIC.
working in this regard?

Ground of the First Appeal:

The information provided is unsatisfactory.

Order of the FAA:

Not enclosed

Ground of the Second Appeal:

The reply to point no. 2,4,5,6 and 8 are unsatisfactory.

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present:

Appellant: Mr. Vijay Kumar Yadav;

Respondent: Mr. Satish Kumar Sethi, UDC on behalf of Mr. R. C. Antil, Public Information Officer
& SDM(Election);

The Appellant states that he is satisfied with the informant provided to him and does not wish
to pursue the matter.

Decision:

The Appeal is disposed.

This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
25 June 2011
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here