[N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG_A___LOR£~i DATED THIS THE 4"' DAY OE FEBRUARY'f2t):..i"§).r-.4 BEFORE: E E E THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICELANAN1)AEYRfA"R.EIjIj:\g 'LtL49 yezuf..s';....._'- A ' Residing .;=:1.* GLjfdé'I'l_;,.'B€jV£ifi',"E". E V E M;1:agaL;;:e--5A7E5_.ou4.. _ APPELLANT (By Sh1'i._;_'\/1".\/"'i~s.Eé'\,=.'i:;;j;i} 'R.,;_é'i' z;1_i'1LI" S hri. K. . .f z='1"y":1Ept.'EE i_<a:s ate 5,1 AND: 1. i__)'S1h.-';1§" E 5¥'St?1,?:< ; !:_l....;11:;= El'-"r'a:----w.--'« is US i E V as. _ A :._1h"0_L1£ ()0 3.--'<:'.111s. " Ré:;~;. i_di fig .31" :1 ma 1'2} ur Pudu V u. ._ VP(is:«f""\/.;11':1'21'E}ur, A VM:n1gL1Ei<--,w'e Taluk. RESPONDENT
~ ~f’.fjV»-w__E{Sh.ri.G.B;}.}’21k1’is1111u Sh;-:s1ry_ Adv<)a;a[e')
— A This I{egL1i;11′ St-*co:1ei Appeal is fifcci Ltndcr SL:<;t'in I00 01′
Cix/if Code PI'()C<;'.(§[tI'C ztgz-xinst' the Judgnlcm and D€L'I'€-6 claueci
é
'_.-J
3. The SLtbSl£Entl&1l t]tIt:Sll()n.S of law that are st)ta’gl~1t to be
frttmetl by the 2:ppe.ll:~.mt are as follt)ws:
“a’) Whether the ‘jut:lgetne.nt and decree 1)z1S.,$§cl.Vb_y.l.ti1e Lower”
Appellate Court is c0rrect’}}b
b) Whether the findingg1″eet)t’det’i~,bl§/ the
Court with pgggttg-A to :1ee W
C) Whether the t’ittt.l:i’ng Lower Appellate
Court theatv_.the of the Suit
by the Lower Appellate
has }”)l'()VC(,l his title to the
_l3l'()l:)l’€ :4 J! S’ ‘t’t>t’l”::<; 1:.' l '
of these _give rise to any substantial
"(t4t:l"'_lv;t.tx-'D;Tlmuglt there is an attempt to C(')t}lr':t'td that the
.vquestl(3nz fntrned at pomt no. (ti) above, is 21 substantiztl
:qttestit);1 of law. in thy opinion. it is not so. as it I'€lE3.{CS to 21
6
‘:”inding,_ of fact” \-vhich is a:o11cL1:”ren1’}y {ound in f”£E\/'()LI_1f of the
defcndam by both the courts beiow.
Accordingiy. the appeal] is rejected.
‘
3%,!”
H.w.;-f«’ S;-*~»
H