High Court Kerala High Court

M/S. Alleppy Company Limited vs Ebrahimkutty.E. on 28 May, 2010

Kerala High Court
M/S. Alleppy Company Limited vs Ebrahimkutty.E. on 28 May, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14154 of 2010(T)


1. M/S. ALLEPPY COMPANY LIMITED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. EBRAHIMKUTTY.E., ALUMPRAMBUT,
                       ...       Respondent

2. RAHMAT.Y., POTHENPARAMBU,

3. SASIDHARAN, ALUPARAMBIL VEEDU,

4. H.M.SALI, POTHENPARAMBU,

5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP

                For Respondent  :SRI.JOHN BRITTO

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

 Dated :28/05/2010

 O R D E R
                         K. M. JOSEPH &
                M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
             - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                W.P.(C).No. 14154 of 2010 T
             - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
            Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010

                            JUDGMENT

Joseph, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court with the

following prayers:

i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any

other appropriate writ, direction or order

directing respondents 5 to 7 to afford

adequate and necessary protection to the

petitioner company and its workers

building, plant, machinery and or smooth

transporting of raw materials and finished

products to and from the premises of the

petitioner company,

ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or

any other appropriate writ, direction or

order directing respondents 5 to 7 to

W.P.(C).No. 14154 of 2010

2

consider and take appropriate action on Ext.P1

and afford necessary and adequate protection

to the petitioner company and its workers.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

counsel for the party respondents and the learned Government

Pleader.

3. We take note of the interim order. The learned counsel

for the respondents submits that there is no obstruction now.

We record the said submission. We make the interim order

absolute. We further direct that the petitioner will co-operate

with the conciliation proceedings before the District Labour

Officer as a condition for making the interim order absolute.

4. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

(K. M. JOSEPH)
Judge

(M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS)
Judge
tm