Central Information Commission Judgements

Ms.Aradhna vs Ministry Of Railways on 31 January, 2011

Central Information Commission
Ms.Aradhna vs Ministry Of Railways on 31 January, 2011
                       In the Central Information Commission 
                                                       at
                                                 New Delhi

                                                                             File No: CIC/AD/C/2010/001308

Date  of Hearing :  January 31, 2011

Date of Decision :  January 31, 2011


Parties:

           Applicant

           Ms.Aradhana
           D/o Shri Sushil Kumar
           Street No.7
           Chandra Nagar
           Krishna Colony
           Moradabad

           The Applicant was  represented by Shri Sushil Kumar during the hearing.

           Respondents

           Western Railway
           Divisional Railway Manager's Office
           Rajkot Division
           Rajkot

           Represented by :  Shri R.S.Sharma, PIO & Sr.DPO and Shri S.D.Oza, Clerk




Information Commissioner     :   Mrs. Annapurna Dixit
___________________________________________________________________


                                                 Decision Notice




The complaint is dismissed. 
                       In the Central Information Commission 
                                                            at
                                                    New Delhi

                                                                                         File No: CIC/AD/C/2010/001308
                                                         ORDER

Background

1. The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.15.5.10 with the PIO, DRM Office, Western Railway, Rajkot. 

She stated that there was an ongoing  dispute  between her and one Shri Anil Kumar in the Patiala 

House, New Delhi.  She added that Shri Anil Kumar had filed an affidavit in which he had mentioned 

that his brother, sister and his entire family   are   dependent on him,   which is incorrect since his 

brother   Shri   Vinod   Kumar     is   employed   as   an   ASM   in   the   Railways   and   therefore   cannot   be 

dependent on his brother. In this connection  the Applicant sought the details of family members ho 

are   dependent   on     Shri   Vinod   Kumar.   Shri   R.S.Sharma,   CPIO   replied   on   17.6.10   stating   the 

disclosure   may   cause   unwarranted   invasion   of   privacy   of   the   individual   and   is   exempted   from 

disclosure u/s 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act as personal information.  He added that the Applicant has not 

been able to justify how such disclosure would be in public interest.  Being aggrieved with the reply, 

Applicant filed a complaint dt.Nil before CIC.

Decision

2. The Commission on perusal of the submissions on record and after hearing both sides, and   after 

noting  that the Public Authority is not a party to the ongoing dispute holds that the information sought 

about dependents of the employee  is indeed personal information  the disclosure of which  has no 

relationship   with   any   public   activity   or   interest.   The   disclosure   on   the   other   hand   would  cause 

unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individuals concerned. The Commission hence finds no 

reason to interfere with the decision of the PIO .

4. The complaint is dismissed  and the case closed at the Commission’s end.

 (Annapurna Dixit)
Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy 

(G.Subramanian)
Deputy Registrar

Cc:

1. Ms.Aradhana
D/o Shri Sushil Kumar
Street No.7
Chandra Nagar
Krishna Colony
Moradabad

2. The Public Information Officer
Western Railway
Divisional Railway Manager’s Office
Rajkot Division
Rajkot

3. Officer Incharge, NIC