Ill THE HIGH COURT OF JIPLRNHTMIFL, RANGPLLORI DATED 'H-I18 '1'!!! 2!!!! DAY 03' APRIL 2000 333033 11-13 I-IOWHLI ran. ausncn nu n In. :15 n: ':nn1I!r.'~.|_a,Ar'\_ L. --n-:...1--nmn ms iim: iihifilifi % V GENKML INSUIIRNCI C0. fi'!'.D'*~ no 31.? n 3 wanna um: nzssmu man HEN! BANGALORE 8'fl53._K '§'?>f1'§*iiis1onAL 51:1 9' sunanmm; _ NJ\'2._5!:« . ' 1- ' SID ran.-1*: -rt-13.11'-.a§va:mJ'% nmr 269% '~'z'4II* A ' n c A co:-stung". % 5:-5:amt-:a_r:u._I:.IL 2 1,2:-z-;:ug:; on _--- ---._..« ~i;J:.ac:9n w1;anan:.aw-a u.-1 .
I we sx:i’;’s?’nAr:Hmnu
“WET iii) .– ~13. iii?! fiififii
mmm nlnnv Lawnm-
%_ A nonarc mmmmnz
‘ ‘”3_§\llGALOR.l-43
nnrouullws
3:-1 A nmnaam, Amt. Iron 1:1,
g3- gnmnnx
XII’ 11 f
THIS 3.! IILIII UNDER ARTICLIS 226 MID 22′? 0!’
‘PH! CONSTITUTION O!’ INDIA ‘I’D OUBSH THIS OKDIR
TJ .11.ii.?l7fi7, Ffifiiifi Ff Til? (‘3I’iun’r vi’ 1
B C ‘I
u — -u -v-w’–..-_
I I.-
‘U..aE $33 .”!E’.!’9′.% $192!’?! $11.!!! ‘1’R_1,nuuni_».
nmsanons N n.v.c.no.1’mo1 ma: mu-3 Axum-t:..
Heard the counuz. tor t:’iiiba:._”;aa;-ti§’sQ t
2. nuponaant: Amen. Kélain
patiticn baton the .A’§g.§ga1on in
IIJI. C. no. 111/Of! ‘ g on account
of the %§u§éa:.§ea mm in a road
tratric jiicaeaéérifid “ea 711. 10. 2006. The
et_:gid;»::f;$:~v~__;:u % the t.ra1.I.’1.c police in
can fies semis
iaccagdi-fig’ the 1” respondent. hl has
1:§__l:’a’;§_ T. at zoning and Lady cm:-son
I-I<:a.'5;1i,;9'.*;fi1._ $;!§iq|J.oro. The gotitionor-insurance
'c.::.ga:$3v=. £i.iod an application Iaoiou the ecu:-1:
.v__iPzsthcr" gum» the 1* zosponuioni: his
regard to the injuries sustained by him in tbs
accidsnt on 11.10.2006. Though summons was issued
on tho casualty lisdicll orficsr, tho
use not produced. Thsrsturs, the |_.1st:it'.:l.o__n;:'s'::=«' A'
casualty Hedi-cal ..£..iee: £9: said.'
the aifi"ir'5i1'I'fi rigitir, fiir.-h ' .. -"fi1ieaf::.ér. i
rajoctsd by tin Tribunal. This' 9:66: is «-::_V'£'311<i¢':' if:
qussticm in this writv :2gj:it:La":'s…
-I. 1 hsvs hssrd ths..§auussj. $129.1′.-“b*§IV:’j2.«;raV”p.n.rtiss.
5. lam; 1I_:1~.,s_ uisputing the
accidamt amd_ fths 1″ respondent
in the .. the 1″‘ rsspondsnt has
come to t’1’w:’t:»::u’1:-‘i:V”.t:hst he was trusted at
_VBawrig1gg”‘e1:d Viittussaoria Hospital. Bangalore. 1:
ugh V” zssvistsg is produced borers the
if
‘ :”L§ijas;i§ns in tho accident: and was treated in the
i hospital. on 11.3.2006. admittedly, the
Laccidsnt rogistsr has to be tuintainsd 1
I:-was-nlunt Hospital. 1:’ such accident rsgistsr is
/
6/
not produced bntoro tho court, in apito qr
summons inautd Hy tn: court. it in tho duty at
the caurt to iaaun warrant against tho conco;fié&
utxicoz. whoa auch rvgiatux would go to t§i~:@fi§?J”u
of ant case, the Tribunal should _n§t ‘h§§§”
gejegtgg the ;p9;;e;t;9n
rheretcre, the writ getitiea has : “aé ai§,;§§a ”
6. In the result, tfi§a_wx;t §a§1E1§fi is
allouud. The nrdor ‘fi§§s§flj ¢y”*;h§”.Tz1huna1 in
rejecting tha _agp11¢g§ign go z 1é§n§ warrant
ggginat caauait§3 Hnfi1ca15;O££i§i:Q: Barring and
Laéy cLrzen5″_a9ite1 Lgteé ;1=12;2oo1 ;g has…
qaaah=a.’WThe ?éiaua§1: is ¢i:eete¢ :9 issue
