High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Bangalore Disc-Tech Pvt Ltd … vs Nil on 12 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M/S Bangalore Disc-Tech Pvt Ltd … vs Nil on 12 June, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH coum' OF KARNATAKA AT eaneatgasfkk T{ % A

DATED THIS me 12?" DAY OF      T 1 

BEFORE  

'me HON'BLE MRJUSTICE ~=;t2w.N SP1fiNTAi§fi®QV9A'R  %

COMPANY Ai>PLICATI£:§§§i»v§4Q.1626;C'-lCiQ?VVV5

co PAN'! 

 

BETWEEN:

M] s.Banga1£3i*€:    ' '
Pvt. Ltd., . ii  " ' . 
(in1iquid;:a;%in:;}*g.  _  
replay   

High Cciurt' of.     =  

4:12 F'!oor,"§§) &,1'«" "\3Ii::1g~.   

Kendriya  Koraman

Bangzakwre-34'      ..APPLiC1ANT

A ' {By*3§-i £;ee9ak. A§1§;;",}" "

 ,   .. RESPONDENT

….-..~……..__

H This application is fiied under Section 462 of the
. Coi:ripan’ms Act, 1956, praying ibr an order appointing an

auditor ‘ta audit the accounts of the: Oficial Liquidator for

“the half year ending 30.9.2007 and fix his mmunderation,

regarding the Iequsirement of Scctima 462(5)_.vw~.§3:£7._e..éQf of the
auditors» fee and agsq xaisgsgzismg with the
requirements’ ‘-hf. _. Companies. Act,

1956. V ‘

ifiudéit iis The auditors’ fee shall be

in terI3′;wzxs*~«.Vof dated 8.6.2007 passed in

i[20{i’?’.«v….3′.,1:;e requirement of Section 462(5) of

Ast, 1956 is dispensed with.

A fipfififiéflon is allowed ancordm gly.

Sd/-I
judge

*~::tk/ ~