M.F.A.NO.24?4/2605
-53-
THIS MFA FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE; Mr} CFC
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21.22005 PASSED ON I.A.NO)1
IN :33 NO.9034/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII A£>:3L.cI.*i"x-'--,
CIVEL JUDGE, BANGALQRE (Can-15;, Dismissime 1.A.4Is4.c3;-;fi_
FILED BY THE AP?ELLAN'F HEREIN UK) 39 R 1 &j;;'.;:i(',s:2_'-._
GRAN!' OP' EXPARTE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING 'E'HI.-$1, 3
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ._ '
JUDGMEN?«" V .
"his appeal by the
ixiterlocutoiy order dated. bj§..thef§tI'ia1
court - the Court of 'viii =<i::vi1 Judge,
Barigaiore, in thejsuit N¢;é::se34/3904. By the
impug1e:~:_:1 or_c'iez9;g i.:;t_1e, £3-tmrt has dismissed the
appficati0ii~i,2%..eNe."1éV the appellant/p1ai11tifi'
S uncie;;_;):~c1«:r ;me1;1es 1' 83.2 of the CFC for gain: of an
V. '~.Vpv;fiieritb£" injunction against; the defendants
reepeci' shit property.
._ hsive the learned counsel appearing for
Vajtipeflam and perused the impugxed order. None
.___"';'.:ip15¢eared for respondent No. 1. Respondent No.2,
_ Lthrmgh served with the notice of the appeal, has
remained umrepresexuted.
W
M.F.A.NU.i2474[Z2(‘i05
-3-
3. Leanleci counsel appearing fer the appellant
submits that on 1.6.2005, this Court had genteel
interim order restraining the respondents/deie;1d§§;fi t_S’.j’ ”
from disturbing the plaintiff’s peaceful 3
occupation and enjoyment of the I. T
common amelaifies and faei§iitiesV” .e:ijoye¢f1 ‘ V
plaintiff and their tenants e_u St:ar }II1dia
Pvt. Ltd. The said oi’de_r.Hf1a_$..e’.been continued
from time to time and is .i:1.fQrce–as dii’.d.€ite.”‘
4. L(§4′.3:I’I};€C1.1 – __ — appearing for the
appeilant’/A presently there is no
disturgfizinee TbyV”‘EheVres:=pondents. He further submits
.i e*~–gosted for the defendants’ evidence and
as ‘?jie,eaI?51’e’sai{i.’ii1terim order has been in force for the
‘last: 4′ égreais, the appea} may be disposed of in
V’ ,0? ?the said interim order. He further submits
‘eertain ebservations made 112 the course of the
‘V V ‘4″‘Viefpugned erder would prejudice the ease of the
appeilantf plaintjfi”. Hence, he praymr a direction to
W
M.F’.A.NO.247’¥[2f}___{}5
-4-
the trial court: to dispose of the suit expedifloizisifif ~
Without being influenced by the o__bse1f\;auoi1’s”
the course of the irapugaed order.:”:.&I§>’e;fe1*:LV oitzeiwise, 77:
my opiruion, the tria} court not be_
the observations made an intefioczogtoijf ‘orsiier,
disposing of the main. matter. “
5. in View of "it....g_ppmpriate to make the 7 (1) that 1 is sebaside; the by this Court on
‘ 1.€3:~:3005V Va;11o«v_extended fiom time to time
. Shel} eo11ti:;3_._1e,ti1l the disposal of the suit;
v. court is directed to dispose of the
A’ v.. S&ujvi Vi.n_.1~~O.S.No.9034/2004 expeditiously
_ 3116 Egiii any event Within six months fiom
” ,. sizigevdate of receipt] production of 3. copy of
. {his juciment and without being
A influenced by the observations mafia in
_o the course of the order impugned herein.
Appeal disposed of.
Sd/–
Judge