High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Chatha Foods Pvt. Ltd. Village … vs State Of Punjab Through Financial … on 31 March, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
M/S Chatha Foods Pvt. Ltd. Village … vs State Of Punjab Through Financial … on 31 March, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH


                                   CWP No. 5158 of 2009

                                   Date of decision: March 31, 2009




M/s Chatha Foods Pvt. Ltd. Village Chaundheri, Tehsil Dera Bassi


                                                     ..... PETITIONER


                 VERSUS



State of Punjab through Financial Commissioner Taxation Punjab Civil
Secretariat Chandigarh and another


                                               ..... RESPONDENTS



CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH


Present:    Mr. M.R.Sharma, Advocate,
            for the petitioner.

                 ***


       1.   Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to
            see the judgment?
       2.   To be referred to the Reporters or not?
       3.   Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


M.M.KUMAR, J.

The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing the

show cause notice issued to him for best judgment assessment. The only

issue raised is that the assessment sought to be completed is time barred

as period of three years in respect of the assessment year 2002-03 has

come to an end by the time notice dated 04.03.2009 was issued. The
CWP No. 5158 of 2009 -2-

petitioner has already filed reply dated 24.03.2009 (Annexure P-7) to the

show cause notice and the order on the aforesaid show cause notice, by

taking into consideration his reply, is yet to be passed.

Having heard the counsel for the petitioner, we are of the

considered view that the question of limitation is not a pure question of law.

It is mixed question of law and facts. As the petitioner has already filed the

reply to the show cause notice, on which the respondents are required to

pass final order, so at this stage, the writ petition cannot be entertained.

Dismissed.

( M.M.KUMAR )
JUDGE

(AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH )
JUDGE
March 31, 2009
pj