High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Deepchand Kishanlal vs The Director Dept Of Mines & … on 18 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M/S Deepchand Kishanlal vs The Director Dept Of Mines & … on 18 June, 2008
Author: N.Kumar
 ..,..x.... -. ...............,.... naun LAJUKI ur nmmnlaim HIGR COURT or KARNATAKA ms!-1 COURT or KARNATAKA men c

.1-

fl'? TEE I*§¢'.}H CGURT SF KARNATMQE, BANGMDRE

QATED THIS THE 13* DAY 0F JUNE 2oas l?%%% %

BEFORE

'rm.Ha:mL2m.JUs1:cz     k

 

1 ms ammmmn.   % 
2% REG   
mzyammsrrzn   '- '
Amy     
No.-m*%:a+%%iw %   A
5AflA;$HlV$HAi}AR;HANGAL€}RE an

 %%%% _     mnnormn

ac-no--o-.r.'.

VA 1.  maascron

A _ ' A mars" {>3 miss 5 9301.429?
, * %_«x:a«.mmamvm, 2 a mm
X  aamamaz :

 2  sEem*rAmrm GGVEHIBEEKT

. ,  fifififlfifififififl 1783311 Sffflfi BEPARTHENT
" SOHHKA, BANGALORE 1

 Q THE mrsoam smzmwnmz

Pfi &  3 LTI1,
REP%E'HI'EI1'I B"{'l'I'S
BQANAQEIG DIRECTGR
3% R.P. 
I*I0.3&, $1331 GF~II
REV EXIEHSIOH

I-can-nu.



KPRNATAIQ HIGH COURT OF KAFNATAKA HIGH COLRT CI' KAHNIATAKA HIGH C

"run u-an-uu-1 :'u\.1r1 \._\{UliI V!' I\.F\Kl'I\iF\IU\ HIGH  

-2-

mm mass, samsawszmcan
 mspom.wra_' 

{By  : 3 *2' mmmfia 93.45359, amp ma R'i*'£ie}jvV;'$_'5'._*{VI':'§VéI5I.

ASHQE  .L1mam,,wm. FOR   L.

'THIS 'W121? ymmm m I='u'.a.fir3..z11wtnz:_1é');1é:':<;Vi;E%sA.22§ a '

Mm am' 35' 'rm caxsxrmmczi OF'm1A-iV_'1_'(3=
amm' ma: RE$POHI3EB'l'S we GRAMREHEWAL <::5*L',z':.?..r.¢

mime zmss 09 THE PEmom':'a_ IR' E'.;K$PEC'i? 'ow
mam. 2345 {GL3 NQ510},-..__FOR may <:*R£:_; (331212 
mm my sin AGREE oz? s<):imz:NAHs1.LL

mm HATWFALA mmaw oF'Vv'gHm;am§ 
mmmymm mm 0m'%Jn1:s::m.:;»~33*m;c'1*.  

'THIS PE'!'l'I"IOH   ?§:1r...H<:. Tm mar,

THE t.";¢;'3{§E:'E' Mam    ~

 

  as'  End wapondelczt. 'ha grant

rial  the pestzitiazz,-at in rampant tzrf

% _ 4_  %;?;%.§*2:3e:§Vs {Sm) %£q;~: fivn-are over an area af 319 was

 J smmrfi and Hathyala mm of

A %  "I'ip¥.:ur mhik, Tumlazr mm, 11¢.
 J t  ~.   sought for a direcfion in mm
%   irampzart pexmata ta u-agape:-t the mmeral.

fimfizapetifinnet-wa3g11~anUaéa:1&Ieaseon
3fi:.0'?',1§6f2 in Mining [@515 39.513 mar an araa af640

V



.-- we-up .

...... . -95.". us Iv-uu1rur\l\:-I mun uuum IJI' Ismtnlnlnlifl HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH 0

-3-

acrw mm$§m:dertheafiarmafivfl]a.gma§per
 fi. On 2-'?-1§'?'3 he filzw an 

rmafirai saw a rwuced arm. sf 310 acraag 
wad" by am Stam Ga ,  Ag  V _ & 
as the; Scanned Govexmmt Ting:  

azmcm the sum  ._'_£::r 

appficaatian for  fig:  ';.%.gai:'a it was
mat amnaiciww   renewal.

'Ema was a     ta ta Cwal

 

--  'iigi  giimction tn the staee
   of the rwal
   diabeyed. There was a

  A.fi141j%:&pf¥§§'3&ti0fl far mm}. On 27.9.1994,
   As per the said Rules, if the

1'?"  Tw ma dispwezd :31' w:Hhm' ' a

 *'-5135: it 55 defimfid 11' haw hem "waded 5)'

A     perimi til} thae: Siam Gov-smmerit paasm an
   'émreaxz... The State  nt passed an order
 arrmal  the mam a-om 5.7.1974 frat a period

af 26 ywwas. Cm 61.04.2004 a lease deed mine 11: be



pan-urn a 1:110?"

. .. ................. nlurl Wyn. Ur mmnmm HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HEGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH c

-4-

wecuted, On 13.2.2901, the patifianer has sought for

d?gec:aa W fhe 1:: mpendem. tn» 
parfinmiarua which the pezitz'nne1_'_%..h$,$'  
Gsntrnllfir $3" Mm has  .
 the case  

am pefiticnm     ac
gmbgtm;  basis of M21
 am    'ren-
are as»      t aféar
 $"af  has 11% granmd than
2      itruwk cf Jamxaljr 200?'. For

 

the a§g&%uem. '   not been. gramfi. Tluia is

 t;.'<2§r¢AA§%I"i:u*:*'Vor2:im' 422$' rfial of mixing lame.

 cfiwmtarrfi, the petitinnar is

   approach tmk (Zeurt fior a writ of

3$fiLu%qt!1epe&:emt1cyaft}1e1vr.itpe¥iti1na51xaw

 muse nmim has hem fisaued at the. p¢®ner ealhng
R/.



-5-

upon Erém €29 shaver cause wlsxy his applieatixm for renewal
&&u1& man: he mjmbad. V '

Q». The rmpondems e..resex'x;mi.__  

 E mm }m.rd the   fir'= 

thepartiaa.

5; Ema; tha.   clear that the
   afizer the expiry

0f   an applinaticn for

Iuarl -...-Jun: vu nnnnrunnn ruun \..\._aI..gtsI \J'l' nnnnnlnnn l'll\3l1 uuunu Ur nnunnlnnn HIUI1 LJJUKI U1' IKAKNATAKA HIGH CUURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C1

zfiaal.   ktzmaxtiser-ed' though the
appfimfipna  wha bad exmxlar' ' Iy nmde

  ieaam have beam rfied.

 has made an application finr

 with law wisthin me azzipulatea
  a mamnabh time the reumndmxta am
  wmfigr the aafl request and pass

%   mam. New r1ear1y§a51:: years have elapsed.

 % mm is rm gumrmauan for the respondents

far 333% mmiamag ma appfizatinn. m is mm

‘K/%