High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Fair Growth Agencies Pvt Ltd vs Nil on 4 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
M/S Fair Growth Agencies Pvt Ltd vs Nil on 4 November, 2009
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
' V"  - RESPONDENT.

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 04″‘ DAY OF NOVEMBER. 2089

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MoHA1$z:”REzTjBS?

COMPANY APPLICATION -NO’.~3115_ OE. Czérjé”

COMPANY pE’rrr15i%r NO,2’E4″OFCC’2rj0–3 A.

BETWEEN:

M/S FAIR GROWTH AGENCIE_S.PV.’_1’§’LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAIJ LEQUIDATOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, ; ‘A _
CORPORATE BHAVAN, 1.2-TH F’LOOR_;.._ _
RAHEJA TOWERS, NQ;26’~2f?, ROAO;.V

BANCALORE:.:5EQ:w0o1;:__ g

(SR1. DEEPAPHE ADVS. FOR OL]

1.» VNTL

. .. APPLICANT.

.T1*£[S4VC’COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER

a;62_ OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH
‘RULES é 1’3.(b);’AND 298 OF’ THE COMPANIES {COURT}

UuLES,..1C9_56 PRAYING TO’ APPOINT AN AUDITOR TO
AUDIT’-THE ACCOUNTS OF THE OFFICIM, LIQUIDATOR

FOR HALF YEAR ENDENG 3}»~03~2009 AND FIX HES

ML

REMUNERATION AND TO PASS ORDERS AS REGARDS
THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 462(5) OF THE

COMPANIES ACT, 1956.

THIS CA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS,.’BAYE_E’T}iE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ‘ .

AuditOr’s report is aCceptet;3MAEVa1bn(l’ his in

terms of the Order dated péiggedv

No.21 1/2007. The requireme’n:.t:V”L1:r1devf E’yeCiiO_f:; sof thé V

Companies Act, 1956Vi:”s…vc.iisp<?h's*;ec'?;_:

Company appIicva.*.iVO:f1:'i.s *
Sd/–

‘-|’hD’Id..’._as’.£..