Karnataka High Court
M/S G S Kenchannavar vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 April, 2009
WP NQ62599-603/2009
1 1 :
II'? TI-IE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
cmcvrr BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED arms TEE 29?" DAY OF APRIL 2009 _ ' ' ' "
BEORE
"rm I~1ON'BLI£ 2\»m.3US'EICE ::4.G§:r1:qJA:. '
WRITPETITION No.52599.6ii%3g_{x'_i 9'g';:xPr{;ic)A%%' .. _ "
BETWEEN:
1" IWSGSKENCHARNAVAR
BYITSPROPMEWR _
GURUBA; SABANNA KENCEJANNAVAR --« * «.
AGEI)42YI§'.ARS - ; =
2. Mrs BAI
AGEr>37*;:£ARsV
3. SR1 AME§£hISABVBA.SHASAB "BILAGI (A B BILAGI}
5?» {TS PROPRIETGR '
. 'AMEETJSAB BAEHASAB. BILAGI
_A.GE:B BWEARS ....... ..
4. V' " 'vHA3Z,K'S:BA;C3:%WAN & sows
aY.rI*s.PRQp:21moR
~. «sax KEIAL-BSAB SAIDUSAB BHAGWAN
' AGED 35
5' N .3 Eiswgwao
. 2*; PROPRIETOR
AA : NAHRAHMMAD
_ 'szo BASHASAB @ BALASAB HONAWAD
man 43 YEARS
. ACL ARE GENERAL MERCHANTS & COMMISSION
"AGENT APMC YARD NAVAEAGAR BAGALKOT587i {)2 ... FETITIONERS
V' (BY SRLCHANDRASHBKAR PATILABV.)
WP No.62599--603 [2009
I. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPT OF CO OPERATEON
M SBUILDING V b
BANGALORE ' '
2. THE IDERECTOR
AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ;
R.AJB§1AVAN ROAD " '
BANGALORE 560001
3. THESECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL monmg MA§{KET1E:¥G f.'.fO?».*I§%.4I'!'FEE
BAGALKOT
D1S'FBAGALKO'I'. ._..R-B;=31=§oNDm~TTs
(BY sR1.R.K.HATr; ' ' BSGP _ V_ -
SRI'MALLEiAR"TUIJ Basaxarsgapyé grzza. -zvozg' gas}
firms 133I*i'tr1o1~:"§.:s 31:31; UNDER ARTICLES 225 AND 227 OF
THE CQNSTf§!IT£€fi~I 'o1r"~..1:'w'D:A' PRAYENG TO QUASH 'I'I~1TE
ORDERfN{?{IICE D}';1'E"Q26.9."2Q§C¥8 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE ~G~1 TO 5
PASSED BY AND ETC,
3 ,1 9:313 PE'fi*rIc§i§I Cénmsa ON FOR PRELIMINARY EEARING,
" _ i)A§:',, Tag CC>UR'I'* THE FOLLOWM3:
ORDER
“mi Basamddy, learned counsel submits
thai he tmtcred caveat for respondent N03
Sri.R.K.Hat1:i, learned HCGP is directed to take notice
ffiar respondents 1 and 2.
WP N€>.62599–603 /2009
‘7. Mniviallikatjun Basamddy, learned cmmsei for__.’%§ié” f -5
APMC is permitted to file his power in the zegigghy.
8. Sn’.R.K.Haifi, learned HCGP is «.
memo of appearance within four wee-k5, ~
Jm/–