IN TEE HIGR COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BATED was THE 25113 DAY or sEPTEMn_12=$ié' 25:';-i§ .91%::__j'. _
Pnmsamf »
TI-IE HGWBLE mm. 9.13. Dxxaxéamx, ;f:zi:,E:.'§~..'JU;si*:*;mE.
my
'THE Howam MRJUSTECE aéeéigs 3Iim'~I?:A§z.§§}oUBAR
Writ Agga} {L-»TEf-?.1
BfE'.iW't3'.€iZ§:
M} S E§i:1c1'ziSia;:4--V}'*:3i:t'<:3}ci_1;;m {Z'0r;§0ra_§iDE1:. L3;-:1.W
Haxzing its Regi.s't::5&»ri V'f3ifi4ic:ret"zi1: .
Jamzahsziji fIf§1ta"~§€:§:zé_,,Ev1u"::ib%ai----'~49$ mag
Ané. its R{;égiT1"1c*i3. {'VJflT1cé=§'IéiI }'4f(>f?'?, {§Io:i"'Ma.dmS Road
Seeravafiinagar PGist»,»._ _§§fi:is}.méa1:aja;%':2ram
Bangalore} 5&3 'z'::16."~ * - .. Appeilaxzt
{B35 Sri ':§;E§i£>éafie'1?;§r Sii Artavimfi C'De@, Aévmcate}
v.':\;1;sriz1iv9;sa"';2*.eddy
S;'{.6{3? Masjié Road
KR. Puram, Ba.z1galm:e ~-- E-36$ U36
. R.Murthy
S/0 Ramaiah, aged about 38 years
R] 0 Mahadevapura
Doomvaninagar Post _
Bangalore W560 048 v
, V.N.M11n;irt:ddy
S/0 Vcnkateswappa, aged aboui'_Vyears'v. 2
R/0 Door No. 49, B.Na:e~ayanapura~-.? " '
Bangalore - 560 016
. M. Lurduswamy
. R'. Chand Pasha 'll '
. P.Rajendra11 VV V.
VS/0 Pc;1'§yassv,amy,"agc:d ahotlt 34 years
i%.,1_o NQ_.'7, ;S,haktinagaxj""£5ehind Til". Ltd.
301d i'aIa£3'L:as .Roak:1--, Dooravaninagar
V.' K.Ba331 ~ A
' Sjo Kfippasfiéazray, ageci abmzt 35 years
_ ' Rgo No.53, Vsnhataraxnanappa Lane
' " * a B5 Ylaxayanapura, Whitelfieid Road
'mangazore --- 560 016
' '¥'Vs~Ia.g%adecsan
0 late Ponnuxangam, aged about 44 years
/0 floor No.37", Keshavanagar
S/0 V.'I'.Mic]:1ael
R/0 No.64, Motappanapaljga "
Inziranagar, Bangaigre: _-- 5:30
S/or Syed Rahim, aBo11_f"3'_2
R/0 No.238,...I)ai'gah'?!{0haJ.1a;--._ '
}Z}oorav311_inagar,= Vfianapugra' _ _ --
Old Madras Road ' "
Bangaicre 4560 015 " "
Bangfiarc A
Magacii Road
=:.= ,A.. ,«-»
Bangalore ---- 560 023 .. _
(By Sri Narayanaswamy, Advocate for M/s M a§::d*« V.
Associates, Advocates)
This writ appeal is filed ujs 4 of
Act praying to set aside the order»passed*--iAn 'the \v§:*i':pcfitioj;1 No,
34818 of 2004 dt. 25.10.2007 and
This writ appea} coming up this 'z¥a1y,_fi§:11e Coult
delivered the fo11owi:ng:-- r '
(De;iv¢§e;1_ bgif'.{§;£}ina1€é§i%;1nv,'__§§.'Jt)
The Ckivcmgzsent of India
LIndc:I'tak?i.I3g._.-- H
2. Accfizdmg "conrlsel for the appellant, flit?
appeHant«compan§" 1j.§Vad- .vad\}E:rf:i'$ed for crerfain vacancies in the
c,efi:ég:)Iy general wfififfiiévn at Bangalore, L.P.G.Plaz1t. The
rcsggV)€v§1(i:zi1F1i$_ the 24 candidates selected and appoizlteei
V' / undertaking from them.
: As the <:0:rpoIat:ion's poiicy the informafion prcxiuced
PE.'$'pOI1(il:'.11tS was reviewed and the documents were
to the doncemed school/colleges for veriftcation
proof of age, quaiizficattéon etc. The school aufhoréties
,.------~--;Z:::
-'=_i"\,j
:7'
. directign" ;~;g~.;;§J1
have confirmed in Writing that the irxfoxmation [)I'(}'§{..1'.€}.{'"l'f'tT},.:
resp0nc¥.en't.s was either false or the d0(:11mentS-._V:h3§'ev?' }..$ee::1_'
fab1"ieai:ed. in certain cases, the sch:-;)<5iVs"'ci<:; "I'ZOt:' tifie
address given. by {he respondents.
issued Show cause notice to the ItSpQ’f’1{?iCHTS”aI1d Iespehdents V
have admitteti their mistake in fhe {he shefiké xrauee notices
and prayed fear condoning I the appellant
impiemenfing the coglgiitjpn ,1 terminated
the services csf the V ”
2.3 tefifiieation, the respondents
raised an h the fnclusfriai Tribunal in
C3.R.No.5’7/ 1’997V *a.1fi.d” Al::;;1V12’et1″ial Tribxlnai by award dated
hi;ei;::s.–4:.t–aTemeI1t of the Iesponclents whose
seA1:Vi:Eee3;i%G’eréA as back as on 25.05.1992 with a further
Vgzer cent. of baekwages from the date of
‘£’_f.1:3I’33’;1i”.f3¢f-11f_’i03u1″ the eiate of reixlstatement with c:c>ntim1it:y of sezviee.
4: by {fie saié award the a;3pe]la31t approached this Court
No. 34818 of 20()4 and the learned Single Judge of
£hi$¥ ‘{i<mrt after hearing both sides dismissed the writ petitien.
2'
mg;
the said principle to the Case (31; hand is nm:~exisi4¢z1€§_;’-.4’_r3.%{e are
supported by {ha fiecisign 3f the figpéx {hurt Qf
GAYATHR1 DEVI vs. SHAHIPAL SiNGH repm:::3..
3% :3
527′ Whemin it :5 held that as a genefigl p;I343§Q3i:t_iQ£[§,A”thé’ §3fifi:V>i(3.Ss§fi0:1″”.,
that fraud i_iI}I’8fiJC}S 693:}-‘fh1?11g is: right, {*:»31 t’ ‘i1e{i’j€ :’§s:&I}:i;§?
ha firlsiafieé and proved. ‘V V V. V H V
5.2 £11 the facts and “£}:1¢ szrasi.-:cA§, %?f3 find in Ehe
absfinee of a Ifigular snqz1i;:f§%v:”;%:;fi%;_ig {mier passed by
the managemcma ‘€j:>313§i1:>t”._be€ s’ij.si*é:1i:jit:<;;i'wi§Iid the 3531:1651 Singie
Juiige W357? i*ig;t:tt. €;{i?g1S}1§;:;gV."':}1€ ' Hifi§1};gE1€{§ ardfir. We find :10
masen to éifiei with, ti3.é"L«vViT€;ni 'éfftgze ieaxnmi Smgic Judgre, T336 xmzit.
agapeal aisc: agmi is dismiz'-ssed. ',3
Sd/-
Chief Justice
Sd/-f’
Judge
/…
A’»».E:.1<?i5x: Y 5:-2; Kfo.