High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Hindusthan Aeronautics Ltd vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara … on 3 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M/S Hindusthan Aeronautics Ltd vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara … on 3 June, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
   %%%%% 
%  1 * - ', BRO1~1m*BANOALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE

     ASHOK HARANAHALLI, ADV. FOR RESPDTS )

%   THE CONSTI'l'U'l'ION OF INDIA PRAYING T0
 *.DIREC'l' TI-IE RESPONDENT HEREIN, TO DEMOLISI-I

«UNAUTHORIZED OONS’l’RUC’i’ION Aaurrme HAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA, BANO§LORE§[ “.
DATED THIS THE 3129 DAY OF JUNE, If ” O-

BEFORE Q ” 4
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
WRIT PETITION NO.79_2O
B

1 M /s HINDUSTHAN AERONA?UT_IC§S» 1:1*;)

AERO SPACE DIVISEON

AIRPORT RQAD, E£ANGA1LOREf_«. O A

A COMPfi;NY5;REGIST1’§2REDij~. A “”” O’

UNDER c:OMPA.N1E:sj%%A1:rO.

REPrED_B*.~r:1’rs SENIOR MAISEAGER (P&A)
LEGALO&jiWEI;w.Ri£.,”‘ O V

SR1 s \fELM’JRI}GAN;__ O PETITIONER.

(By Sri. “FIRM, ADVS.)

A OONOO1;;s.QzJAR.fi;, J C R041),
. ” –I-3ANGAL<)_RE O
O '._REPFEfl,' BY ITS
COMMISSIONER. RESPONDENT.

Lrfixs WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227

4

AREA AND A130 TO mszsr NOC FROM r’RoM
PERSONS WHO INTEND TO PUT: pp coivsrniocrrogw A

THIS PE’rmoN, comma oNe.1fro1é PRELNWARY1

The petitioner’s fiflatlnexure-“A”

having     Banmlore
Mal1ana.gara5    herein, has
  reliefs. Learned

counsel the etibmits that he would be

satisfied a dz” ‘tionA.’isV’.i;ssued to the Corporation to

3»-.ihe’o*..1Afepre§§ueiiétVa1ion Almexure-“A” and pass

oiflers ‘in with law.

I counsel for the respondent-Corporation

e1;bi:Iii:s_ if granted 30 days’ time, the petitioner’s

would be addressed and appropriate

V ” passed thereon. Recording the submission of the

learned counsel for the parties, nothing further survives

J’I”\

KS

for consideration in this writ petitian

petition is accordingly disposed of.)