IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BA2§;:é;AL:)1é§: —
DATED mxs THE 1311! DAY
PRESENT: “x %T X ‘T
THE HON’BLE MR.JU$TiCE»DEEPAK.YI’§I~’fii§
THE HGNBLE “is*.1;1fl§.’.-Jl’}£’§’Vi’:’. ‘3f§:’§i§_i%§§RiANNA
W123?%AP:>EA;;jNQ%;624%,*gi)o7.
m
M] s.J.R.I).URAii}’Mfl§{_ gu,;.c:3{s, ” «
(UNl’F–2),”SHED. :40. 1;; S: IIWEY 193.43,
KENCHAaIAHAI.LI-“£3-RAMA;__ ., ‘ –
R.V.NiKE’I’AN4POE§T,”w
3TH MILE, KENGERI HOBLIV,’
MYSURE ROAD, ”
BANG1?gL0RE–59,”‘ ._
” ….. .. V
‘2_VRf’MAI~§AVEER, .. APPELLANT
ASSTSJ
‘V V«.T-{B3:’vv-ée’;nrr.Vs.*4fA..r3M1N1 sUm:)AmM, ADV. FOR M/3.3mm
‘ .1j:.I’HE-~ SECRETARY TC THE Govmnmmrr,
1)E;H%.. (.3? REVENUE,
= «!\¥0i2TH BLOCK,
V£~¥_I.??;’ DELHI -410 001.
l;2.*1’HE DIRECTOR GENERAL, kg
E).G.C.E.l.
NEW DELHI.
3. The appeal is accmclingly K
been rendered infructuous. 71:0 -I
respectiyc costs. Memo stands
* Mvs