Ms K L Sindhu vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of … on 9 June, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL-ORE 

DATED THIS T1113 9"' mm' 01? JUNE 2099

BEFORE,

THE HOMBLE MRJUSYLTCES. Agfbtsz. j§:é;zE£?ié%  M  %  

WRIT PETITIONNQ 73a1x2g{;3(:§:1iES;.' »  » = V' 

Between:

Ms. KL. Sindhu,

Die late K.LaXn1'maIaya.ua,

Aged about 23 years,  j

'Ashwizaifi Door No.3!-'Ly   ~ 

Cizilmxagaluxz __   4' 5Q  'V  __    C  Pefitioxiez'.

(By Sri  Késvy & Ca, Advs.)

And:

 ~ 1 A  LifeInsu.1;3;nce.€3_0f»p6ration cf Izzcfia,

.' .l;'JAA  -

'V " . V Ca11tréi*0E3pe, "Y'1":ga1<s11e111a',
A  ms:  Ne;19953,
 =-}@E"9&37l }3ii1iE1:V"§:fV{3fg,
" . MLimb3i*-7-E  021,
By its__vE'2;g¢uIive Di1'ecior(Fez'so1n1e1}.

 _ Tha..1;i:§: Insurance Corporatien of India,

 V VSifxg'isiona1Ofiice, 'Jeevan Krishnal
 P.3.Nz).8, Udupi -~ 576 101.  Respondents.

  Thirmnanna Bhat, Adv.)



This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 212'? ef the
Csnstitution, praying to quash the cemmusicatisn daied 22.1G.2G{3'? passed
by the 2"'! respondent, etc.

This Writ Petition csming on for Preliminary Hearing in "}E§*'»Group
this day, the Court made the followmgz ~ '  -.   _

ORIJIE-'R

The petitioner was the adopted dazzghtsxwfssne-'_'i{.Iis1{sh;'"s1iti:%(s.yéna.VV ' ; ii

K.LaksInnin.arayana was working as a  iii2_TLife_ 

Corporatien of India. He died an V_$s*hiié'  'péiitionéf V

flied an appiication as per ,.-Aime:-care "-fist  'va;3§mjintment on

compassionate gmimds, which   Corporaiiozz as per

Annexure 'R2*"'0;"s?.s§£:,daiiéi§"*16;£?,2'{}(}5.& '1'se'Corporason has inssmed the
same to the}:-_etiti_m1'tr. Vss:'.'"ps:"€iiés*--~<:s:nmunieatien at Aimextzre 'A' dated

22.10.2007? The 'pTetiti(;:1:%i"VhaAs~-.sa'.ii--si1 in question the said csmmunicaiien in

%§z{i£'.;;'G?€éCt£t§:U$3'\  "  %%%%% ~ *

»  {vh;1§rs«ixea:if§ .t_i1e learned Csunsei for the parties.

 K.LsIt1erV.t:;a§ie'.  .

an appiieatien fer appointment on compassionate gxeundsmi' I    

beycmd three years frame the date of death of    fiéiiyet./the.I1.t_:&

respondents have rejected the same, as i: iS--time b9.rred. s%pé.it.'fr9tn the

above, the writ petition was flied __afier set7ext:'3;eam_v froth  ef her

becoming major. In my view, the""r::¥Spefidei§is efef:i:g'i:t in rejecting the

eiaim of the petitie_11erVVSee!;i;2:gt eppefizmaefit en eompassienate gtminds.
There is no merit in"mistx§?rit";te;fi¥Ai0tt,."if; is aeeerdingly dismissed, Ne eests.

 .....  

judge

“tietttM;9e2od§r .