High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.K.V.P.Enterprises And … vs The Commercial Tax Officer on 28 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
M/S.K.V.P.Enterprises And … vs The Commercial Tax Officer on 28 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24915 of 2009(H)


1. M/S.K.V.P.ENTERPRISES AND AGENCIES,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, THIRD
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER,

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSMT),

4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED

                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.P.GOVINDAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :28/08/2009

 O R D E R
                    P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
                    -----------------------------------------------
                           WP(C) NO. 24915 OF 2009
                            -----------------------------------
                   Dated this the 28th day of August, 2009

                                  J U D G M E N T

The grievance of the petitioner is that, huge amount is lying at the hands of

the respondent, to be refunded to the petitioner, pursuant to finalization of the

proceedings, pursuant to Ext.P4 judgment, followed by Ext.P6 and P7 modified

assessment orders in respect of the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04,

after adjusting the dues for the year 2003-04. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that, the petitioner has already approached the first respondent by filing

Ext.P8 representation in this regard and the same is still pending.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the first respondent is

directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 representation

preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner, which exercise shall finalized as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within three months from today. It is also made clear that, if

any amount is found as due to be refunded, such refund with interest if payable

under Section 44(4) of the KGST Act shall be also effected within one month

thereafter.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE

dnc