M/S Karnataka Yuva Society vs M/S Silver Springs on 23 August, 2010

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 23%" DAY OF AUGUST 2010 

BEFORE

THE HONPBLE MRJUSTICE ARAVIND Ki§MA§'"u   L

MFA No. 3333/g_Q_(s'1O'(CP€)  .: 

BETWEEN:

1.

M/S KARNATAKA YUVA SOCIETY "  "
[A SOCIETY REGISTERED E.JND_ER '
THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES. '
REGIS'E'RA'I"iON ACT] B 
OFFICE AT No.75, 'c;~£:{1c1«:"

BAZAAR, TASKER  --.L  ;
BANGALORE.   * *
PRESENTLY AT N0'.43?A. j , ._ . ..
2ND sTRBE'I':T.. _(_)LD t:En:iE<1*RY*wROA13. . 
s1~1IvA.3r11a1A(:4;AR, TAS-KER 'I'w_r~I
BANG:ALORB"4~ 5.60 '05-;   V' B. '

:2vEP.W OBYVETS   V

SvV}f»'£T'21UVBE3IVV)AA'»":,/'l1_Q:JE3f';'- .. .  ,.~
SINCE DEAD BY  LEGAL

_ REPRESEPITAITV Es' ~  ~'
 23,.  SIR VIRJEE

 S/O LA'1"E"SULTAN VIRJEE
_ _AOED ABOUT 43 YEARS
 'A _ BESIDINO AT No.3
 , AQUAFORT APTS,
-- ----K§2:Ns1NOTON ROAD
~ _ BANGALORE W 560 042

"s1.=§17~KAB1RHDINN K MITHANI
s/O KASAMALI

V O' AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
* RESIDING AT 26/1

MUNNISVVAMY ROAD
OFF QUEENS ROAD
TASKAR TOWN
BANGALORE - 560 051.  APPELLANTS
[BY SMT LALI'f"HA RAMESH, ADV. AND
SMT SHARMILA MENEZES ADVJ



1. 34/8 SILVER SPRINGS

A REGD. PARTNERSHIP FIRM
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT No.73/1
"SHERIFF CENTRE"

ST. MARKS ROAD

BANGALORE A 560 001

REP. BY ITS PARTNER   ._
SR1 YUNUS ZIA A

2. M/S CANARA HOUSING V
DEVELOPMENT COMPARY 1_ 
A REGISTERED PAR'FNERS§jIIPy FIRM  '
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.85_/ I _
K.H. ROAD, EANGADORE A--.-560027.
REP. BY ITS PARTNERS.  _  I 

a. SR1 P DAYANAN-D' PA:  

b. SE3} P._S1'-\'I'IS'H PAI;,.«tSONS'OF ' "
LATE;;='NARA,SIMHA PAI " 

 'NO:.85}['1:;V K {-1 ROAD '  H »
_BA§\_§Q_ALORE2 :~5€~O"02'7.  '  RESPONDENTS

--. I ' R'RI.SIINAPPA, ADV. St
. SRI R'EI}IA_NIJ_PPASAD, ADV. FOR C/R1
I ;:'\ND.AR.'Z(a}.Cs3z R203) -- SERVED}

**=IHIHI=$#

 'IfH'ISV MF./X"FI,LED UNDER ORDER XLIII R1{r) OF CPC

A{3§13JNST"  ORDER DATED 30.3.2001 PASSED IN
 » Q;S,NO..V2612=/2000 BY THE VII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE,
 BANGALORE, REIIECTING IA NO.I FILED U/O 39 R 1 AND 2 OF

CPC_AN'D  

 COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE

 COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: --

JUDGMENT

H Pursuant to order/direction issued by this Court on

w27.5.2010 an explanation has been given by Presiding Officer

of VI} Addixional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, by

_ 3 –

communication dated 13.8.2010 addressed to Registrar Eudicial

of this Court. It is stated that original suit has been di£.§).o:Seid–t.Qf

on 25.4.2009 by Court Hail No.15 decreeing [h€..A4’1b;i1itiFco1:VI.itZi1ii’iii.iS–v”

also mentioned in the said coH1_’ri1t1nicatioVrii”tiiati ii

proceedings dated 25.4.2009 go to

press his application flied underflirder 39″ R-u._1e”2o(_”a) and

a memo was also recordeidby Trial
In View of the same, ‘iapopefa1 %1as–“bee–o_1ne-~ infructuous and

SE17-‘1
JUDGE

i