High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Karuturi Networks Ltd vs Union Of India By Secretary on 13 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
M/S Karuturi Networks Ltd vs Union Of India By Secretary on 13 March, 2009
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGAL{)VR_E2 ._V'

DATED 'I'H}S THE 13TH DAY OF MARCi*i,__i3:{)0"~9.V'_~    _

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE IgAM..§§(:a1~iAN'A1fz2Ks_~LIM1'r5;_L1, 
N020-4,11 FLOOR, EMBAssY--:~1 CJF VI'N.DA1;«\ C 
 'BYSCRETARVY %
"  Mgnssmv O§?...€f0MMERCE

, um'<)<:%,BHAvAN,
"  1N.EVi¥_B.SLHJ -- 110 011.

2 . h  D§§"§?F;;.:¥=}$MEN'r COMMISSKDNER

 CSEZ.,}*NO.365, 1 FLGOR
BT31' MAEN, 473 CROSS
':72?-€"EKNA(3AR

'T  BANGALORE -- 560 047.

A.{)I§)l'I'IONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL
OF FORFJGN TRADE

ROOM NCL9, GROUND FLO0
U§YOG BHAVAN i

331}



NEW [}ELI~ii -- 10 011.
 RESi-'OND__ENTS

(BY SR1. ARVEND KUMAR, ASG)

THIS WRIT PE'1'm0N IS FILED UNDER AR'1'iCiL;Efi§-L§---- 22:25 ' .
AND 22'? OF THE CON3m'U'1'ION Oi? INDiA 'PRAYMG 'I-'»':).f 
QUASH THE ORDERS DATE!) 143.2094 V'If)E"!{l'€NEXU,Rf£_~ 
E PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT"NCL'2. A1331), C_C)'?1}"'IRMED".

IN APPEAL DATED 27.2.07 BEFORE RTs’§’,s5AP0Ni;r¢3%:s§T’:.;3A

VIDE ANNEXU RE~A.

THIS PE’I’iTION, COMIVNG “€)%N F612 FI1\iAL””t§iis:A’R”:N’G, ”

THIS DAY THE COURT MADE ‘I’H’E_Ff)VLLOWIAN:G: jg

The pcfifiqpcr, under 131::

Companies A(‘:1’t,’ isgxueéi permission No.
LOP gated 26~()5«199E§ :9
set Limit (ibr short EOU) at
Qoddafiéllgfipuf District, by the Ministry of

Comrmgrce éiid li1¢iVi:«s1:AI’§{. G’.(V)vern331cnt of India, in addition to

“”‘–~-‘«:’:V No.{)794-012957 {for short IE Code]

fa:« ‘rmsea, subject to ccxtahz czanditioxzs.

1:. :’appears that the Dimctoratc of Revenue

: i:1t§:11ig.e’:1(*,;e (for short DRI) having conduced a raid, at the

_ of business of the petitioner, aliegmi violation of

should not be responded, and not suspejjzeiefii

the letter of pennission;

b) that the order KflflCXflrfl’1:.éé;’ 2?’

suffers fmm the vies of eioleition

naturai justice in noive«ee5{tending.eg’iEa3§: Ty V

to the gefifiezeer ‘ever the

suswnsion ofelfiie ‘
C) that__ not have the

. 133 Code.

” by filing Statement of
eb3ectie’ii’3!éated “inter cilia admitting the issue of

letter — of pefxnissien : the IE (lode in favour of the

‘ . -.pefifibne3x The vaxiefie incentives and C()I1C€SSi(}I}S extended

is to make the export products globally

the main attraction of the scheme is to

‘*._allow to import capital goods, raw materials, ofice

“ii fuel etc” flee of eustems duty. In addition, it is

‘ seated that the export oriented are expected to functiox:

u in a Custom Bonded area under the Customs Act to fiaeflitate

and monitor mevement of duty flee goods either imperteé or

M

petifiomnfs contention that the 231°’ Z
jurisdiction to suspend the IE J

considered by the mid authority. _