IN THE HIGH cnum or KARNAmAKA Am HA$GA2Qfifif *_
namn TRIS '}1'HE 1" DA'! O1?fMVAL1GUE::'.§3',:~--:2'Q:(l¥'8: "
PREsENw3_
THE HoN*BL£ M. Jusiigs k4:.nAufiu§A$a E
THE HON'BLE MRS.JusT;¢3_B,v.nAaARAm&NA
9: . A... rare 'J._6t§_3 sgaé "
BETWEEN: A*v :rw--f='
1 M./S MAE:-__13Es:--1';wz.rw" _ .f«E1'~:'.'I_'ERE§«'z_ ;:sgsJ'
:eRonm*:»:'as" 5:.' 2 2:, mama
comp}; r¢s;"'2*.;:; I ~, EXTENSION
2 STAGE' ; .. 'V 'cm': was LAYOIIT
sAn'Jm*s:AVR*maR%,» 94
REP :33: .5121. VoM:)=.>3Arg.=saHV..~
2 M/S JAYACr£ANIl!R3s.-, PRODKCTIOHS
ms Kazmzana coLotm
my 'g..2_su_A, 2"*E:.9oR, MODI aospxwm. ROAD
' u_M2zH¥AE;'§KS§_7'MIF'u'RA, sazaamag as
REPRE SiI§';fi£TE§D BY sax B R KESHAVA
3 'His MOVIES
or-'* MANHIRA MAKKALU
zmmna coLm3;m,uo.121, CANAIJGHT RQAD
.. ,QU'EI=.'a}IS ROAD moss, 1==-..z.>.:--:%z.c>'.'.-as 55905
"_ REPRESENTED BY SRI K GANESAR
. . APP£1.:..A1~I-rs
_ Sri : I-1.1~i.MURIDHAR, 2-'on M/3.5223 RANGA
ghssocxawzs )
$4
1 STATE or KARNAEAKA
DEEARTMENT 0? xnrcnuamzox _ _
TOURISM AND xouwa $ERVICE${ w_, ;.w .V,
M 9 BUILDING , DR B R AMBEnKARav32nHi=_,"" 7
aansazoan 1, REPRESENTED BY 123 T * ' '.*\'"'
SECRETARY 'V'y
2 STATE or KARNAEAKA u. ',_AT»
DEPARMTEET OF KARNAmA_aNB_CULTURE,_ V
IRFORMATIN Ann rcunxsa (IEFQRMAIIONAV
BRANCH}, M s BUILDING¢ $3 Bjananznxaa
vzangx, BANGALORE 1' . ., ,_"5¢A(
REP.BI ITS $oHM1s31QEa,f_ '
3 ADVISORY comgITrE5'ccu$Tz¢UTED TO EXAMINE THE
FILMS rogaawgzn Fox was YEAR 2oo6--7,c/o
nzyammaaw cg KAEEAQA AND cunrwaa
INFGRMAEION BfiB ?fiERlSM, FEATURE FILM
DIVISIQN; I F3063; BADAMI wowna
N R caowx; BAflGflLGRE 2,
. Rifikgsznwza BY
==m, its §fihJRMAH}"§fiGhEHiKALLI cxanmaasazxa
. . RESPONDENTS
FILED U/ S 4 OF TIE KARl*’!.3§.’1’AKA EIGH
._H 3,¢éuRr AcT*3nAyxnG TO saw Asxna THE onnan passes IN
_ “$33 wax? ?ETITION uo.13555;2oa7 namnn 29/B/2007.
“I Th:;–.5 appeal coming on for orders this day,
J, delivered the following:
NT
The learned counsel for the agpellazitv’ ”
that when he filed the Writ Pe§:.;i.t:i:;on:
learned Single Judge, that
finalised the award by accepti_:_j;§-..tne at the
Cczmmittee and now Single Judge
dismissed the ;.::et:1t:Lc>n 1.-t3:1.}.:y 7qr:_ ground the
report of the C§zz;u1:L’£_:tt§§”:§j’– accepted
by the Gg¢erfi@§§£”§~an§5t’fifigrafi 15 publishea.
Therefore, Vfinet 1§§§g§¢;_g$§g1é Judge is of the
opinion that Petition has become
-‘3*Jj.nc:y:§”‘ ‘…_.t:3_*;e: petitioner has not
c11ali.ei1g’te”dVt3::?;§é’t«§:rr:§3;er of the Govermtaent.
_2. in at? the same, the learned counsel
“£§£Ttfienappexiant submits that he may be permitted
the Writ Appeal granting liberty for
to challenge the Government order.
dL,/
3. Granting such liberty, the Writ Petitibn i$ ” ”
dismissed as withdrawn. .w-