High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.Marine Chemicals vs The Assistant Commissioner on 23 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
M/S.Marine Chemicals vs The Assistant Commissioner on 23 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 38373 of 2010(V)


1. M/S.MARINE CHEMICALS, DEEPA BUILDINGS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM

 Dated :23/12/2010

 O R D E R
                     C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J
                ---------------------------------------
                 W.P(C) No.38373 of 2010-V
               ----------------------------------------
        Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2010.

                        J U D G M E N T

Against Exts.P1 and P2 orders of assessments,

completed with respect to the year 2006-07, under the

KVAT Act as well as the CST Act, the petitioner had

preferred Exts.P3 and P4 appeals before the 2nd respondent.

Exts.P5 and P6 are the stay petitions filed along with the

appeals. It is stated that the appeals and the stay petitions

are pending consideration and disposal before the appellate

authority. Grievance of the petitioner is that, without

considering pendency of the appeals, coercive steps of

recovery has now been initiated as per Ext.P7 notice.

Hence the petitioner seeks interference of this Court to

restrain the recovery steps, till the disposal of the appeals.

2. Considering pendnecy of the statutory appeals

before the 2nd respondent, I am of the view that the writ

petition can be disposed of directing that authority to take

appropriate action.

W.P(C) No.38373 of 2010-V 2

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on

Ext.P5 and P6 stay petitions, after affording an opportunity

of hearing to the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate

within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

4. Till such time orders are passed on the stay

petitions as directed above, further steps of recovery

pursuant to Ext.P7 shall be kept in abeyance.

5. The petitioner will produce a copy of this

judgment before the 2nd respondent.

Sd/-

C.K.ABDUL REHIM
JUDGE

//True Copy//

P.A to Judge
ab