High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Mitra Mineral Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka By Its Secy on 7 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M/S Mitra Mineral Enterprises vs State Of Karnataka By Its Secy on 7 March, 2008
Author: A.S.Bopanna
IN THE HIGH SOUR? O!' KMIHETNG, BANGAIDRE

nmcn nus TI-IE 07*' DA'! or  aoousT %j{%

xmorua
T' '-was.» LIB: aaswzcs I H nr_>-a~.ms;
mm nrrzwxon No.1as:a 67- was ii'-at-$*'"+s'L
IITWIIN

--r---cu-----.-w--.._.

1 ms ?u'I'i"fi:'%. H1::'.sP..!.I.-. s..Ia'r5.9..'£asI.!s
14 unnn, nAnnA"amnmnw.VsAmnun
iinniir fii§Tfi33Tp-'  E; "rfixfa
EARTHERSHIP FIHH*_ T': ..f=; _;
nnrnnssmwgn ET"ITS"Pi3EfiiR;' E7
3 moammtmt, =28/§1.»ié.N.?J€£_a§i_ 
Assn nnour an vnn3s_.:-V "M
an n1l_t}iaPJ'=W~.. >   "  

' ' ' . H   : 1_ '   A_ '  I ll 

43? g"T"£;EgAfiGEAnHA;-AnV"?GR an: n n u nan,

anflian couua3u)*.'. =w .

RN13:

%  "A_"*i ismnmz or kfihfinmaxn av zws sncnnmnnx

E {EV $33 if i iii'Iaii-.'i'I'5""'i"", 'r':"'£"..GP-u}

 . _I|3FP,t_RTHENT OF mfitisffi 35 ENE
 VIIHHI, IPaN|3flLORI"'01

 "2,§fiiRficwon or nznns Aflfl cannon?
fgfiazaawusuw er uznsg Ann szouosv
'~"KHhflIJA uamwan, nncs counan Roan

fi"'un"" ufiR'3=$1

. . . RESPONDENT8

THIS WRIT I’ETiTi5″ IS F3 53?: u ..
226[ OF ‘1’!-II CONSTITUTION 01′ INDIA PRJWING D
DIRECT THE R1 1’0 CONETZTJEFI F’E’TT.’I”1fii’iE””‘3

1
:1

‘iv

APP L193?! ON E0

9’! Qflfllflghg Lhflg I

3 ‘HKUIKX

‘1″‘i:’I$ ?E’i”It’l’IfiE-E Cu””:’-ilfifi GE €03 Fun-.si;..?.€3.uv.ms

I-mxmt: IN ‘I’ caoue ms cm, was coun-r %

FfIi.nI.:K’i’U1”’.’IiiI§:

The petitioner is :’»J::ei3_c:v:%’s

seeking to: a Hnndam4.§g«…_V..t-oV”‘diract’v:”‘tj;:a_.Vm1!§.rti:.:V:*

xupondant to V__c:o11aiu:_!__tIF§ViA:»v:__ wthc ~~tatt:Lt1one:’a

apgliaatien :9: “*g.t.n_;-1.:

xaapuct 615 th

to» the paf’t|.t£§_’;§:;;_.

‘. t sm:.Anumum. lemma

commtI’«t4_’§y_t§’ati£§g the petitioner: and 5:1

$1. $3 . xanj m-.;-;.*.’…’:’.;
1 . J. I _ . _ __ ..I …

.3,’ “st!-raving heard the rupoctivo learned

4-mmui, I have poruud the writ papers.

-f.. The east at the tttititttt it that the

petitioner has filed an application ciataci

{Q

3″ l.UUlLI \II’ I\l’|ll|l’l’|Il-I||\.I1 nu

06.01.2004 to: grant oz: mining lease aver an

ass; r.a:_E 12.35 nexus of E’-ovetnmerit tovanuaji1*a.nd

in “ahassa “ei- 9: Kgtthikashwara

Sundu: Think of Biliirf Bi.-.t=ie!:…V_A4§iL_,v_§al:J;: _ thei

provisions oi’ man not.

1960. Eunauant to 1:he»’aqppli’r’.:-.htion

petitioner. the Dnputyviviiiairagték-. Hiihnhh and’

“9-av

£4991-adv. I-Ioupot, V s_uiid,_ auhinivttod tho

ifJifJiI’a3’v5i””1 .:~.’.’we:_V-A1;,.. S2’3.§Et2V¢’200d stating

that tug, c§;i~’é:=-.1-413.:-4r;””‘iaVV’*

II

=:

L 1-

gr!

ID

‘I-0
1:3 E

locnt_a_;1 Vgvjiillaqe mu t}–t a
ohjégtieh’kw-x_t«it1.§a1;§. has to be obtained from

the “‘fi§xi’.o.rtmont. – The Doputy

I”!

xkcoiuununication dated 15 . O2 . 2003

3 a;4isé:’~~sain’i ta …a’:e .i..n:;l.ic tad no objection

~. “;’:._¢;:: :””‘¢gr§§§.’&oring tbs u-p’plica..ien at tho

to: grant or mining lease. Basyite

” s aaid procnduxu boinfi flallowed, the

iitéapondohta have not acted in considering tho

applies-.i.=igh filed by the ‘petitioner and

thnrnfioti, the p~=*.:itiehe;- ggntands that the

5″ WI’ I\l’I.IIII’o–_ ..—-_ –

. thé sfibfiaat matte: 0: t.:;s_:_a pandinq

respondents are to he diroatad to -consider tho

;;vpl:Lcnt10n.

5. The 1″iJ:”i”uTI€’; $1-.-.-e::r.-9-.e:~… K ‘

hmowor contend that ::oiai:;i.z1:j_’i:’~’=f;. Q

in the said emu. Q :i0yt i–fica_j:~$.0j;i ”

15.03.2003 was iaIua:\iV.:._V”VIn:z;l th§’z§£0i;§V.HV ehu

4;:-glication at thA0_”‘jpct.:’}Lt:i0A0r$0y.{‘ ‘w0u1d héiro to ho
kafit per.:’.’.’.£.:-.-:,,’._ I..z-..;.i._1.. 150$ thin court.

iaid ifih-uissiena ‘.’…=
the to he considered is
as 0trL¢t11’0nfr: definite -material is

;,_§§.i;gh10 h_§;’£0:0 t;.h:|.a court to state that the

…=.-.5 !..¢’9.1.i9¢_i_ to: the wear nzno lands

§noa§0dinga roluting to the mtifiaatian a.-.-“ea

= :;5.0:a$.200a. Though the detail: of the am-
idea not he oxaminod, on the race or it, what

V is :~.e’t.=;0:¢_Ic,i. in that :11: notification is dated

‘3, -.0′:-..*.1e 1.-M gpgliaation mean by tho

:’%$’–v

— ‘———-+-

an ‘count or KARNATAKA Huau» acoulntnafi I<AIu~u;mu:A Hlurl -……….. … ._ __ B

the naupondnniis ea:-an

gaotitionar is on 06.01.2004 and the mo fifiii

at imicato that the putitionfig has mnde'"%}:hn

afaialiaatien 1,5.n.1.1_cguant to the said m:.::;…1….

claiming 0f the Lgdg V0

notitziod. tnoxom. 1.gar§0:§§§'j%
this court will haw tov0*~
application made by
mar 11. an land in the
ap§1i.a-1-.iar….-.:1.cl. schedule to
the V othorwiao, the
ha-.-e th! power
to the said lfid is en.

§hich is already included in

95:0 ~ the ‘V

whilo »-conaidnring the

:15 1.211. petitioner: and therefore,

‘~F.=b}”x’ln’03§’?.0fl1′..j*””.a’i:-l.i:ii3§ t}-.a’.’: eentain litigationa an

l”l’

ju..1;;:y their

4_.’..::.iv.1tion mom pazticululy when thi 0:50.}-*

honmisaionnn has conaidnnad than matter and

issued 1.21;: no uhjection on 15.02.2005 itself.

-\

)2

Ta

l’l’I \a\tIanu urn .-

7. Thonozloro, keeping, all than upset:

in 4:-I’.-‘1-.-..; t_=l:_u,I zeuponduntzs would hair.é W.to

may or the other if: -r.-cc.-..’:’d…-‘ma…V_A§.’£.f:1:-Q’

‘1’herc£o:a, a necessary dirqctidnp

issued to the xoapondentg iiiK1_9.’h:ls

dispose }f”i:11e, tiled by tn;

potit_i9ne;’::”fi:3:V_ way tn: the 9-‘chi,
in law as oxpoditioualy an

gonaihifi than £1170’ month: from

‘£1-..te ¢;1:._V_ ;?9eo§L’9t at E copy at this order.

fiaiilias 1:1-.4 -~p3.i<.-a..'.I.:.s_n.: at the pat1t$;6z£§$:'__" 513:6'.