Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
M/S.Nazar Match Factory vs The Commercial Tax Officer on 9 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7507 of 2010(K)


1. M/S.NAZAR MATCH FACTORY, CHUNDAMPETTA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, PATTAMBI.
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :09/03/2010

 O R D E R
                     P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
                    ---------------------------
                         W.P(C) No. 7507 of 2010-K
                   ----------------------------
                Dated this the 9th day of March, 2010.

                              J U D G M E N T

Being aggrieved of Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders in respect of

the assessment years 2005-06 and 2007-08, the petitioner has preferred

Exts.P3 and P4 appeals along with Exts.P5 and P6 petitions for stay and

also Exts.P7 and P8 petitions for early hearing, which are pending

consideration before the second respondent.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to

the pendency of the said proceedings, the respondents have initiated

recovery proceedings invoking the provisions under the Revenue

Recovery Act, as borne by Exts.P9 and P10, which are sought to be

intercepted by this Court.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second

respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on

Exts.P5 and P6 petitions for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously

as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till appropriate orders are

passed on Exts.P5 and P6 petitions for stay, all further proceedings

pursuant to Ext.P9 and P10 shall be kept in abeyance.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

ab                         P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

102 queries in 0.192 seconds.