INTTHCHKHTCOURTCHVKARNATAKA,BANGALORE_ DATED THIS ON THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER ., BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 'V M.F.A. N0. 5974 OF 2,oo9ޤaV)~-- BETWEEN: M/SORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, YATHIRAJ MUTT BUILDING,"-_ _ I IST FLOOR, NO.199, 2ND CROSS, SAMPIGE.ROAD,~- . BANGALORE, NOw?,'RERR_ESENTED BY}, ' ITS REGIONAL LEO SHOPPING c.OI\;IPIj,EX, .. RESIDENcY,,ROA.D'~cROsS. " BANGALORE I REPRESENTED '-BYITS _ ' AUTHORIZEDSIGNA'}'QR';.'~ G . ._ :APPELLANT [BY SR1.A.M.x/ENKATESH', ADV.) 1.
S’L{CHITR5,I:”P:£\C{,
WIFE ‘OE LATE. _GI,R1DHAR RAO,
AGE:’S_7 YEARS, *
_ SANDESH R£’IO,
‘ ~ A . AS/O, IATEGIRIDHAR RAO,
AGED’ YEARS.
__ NEELESH RAO,
QSA/.Q..ILATE GIRIDHAR RAO,
‘ ‘ A AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT No.68,
K
2ND MAIN, 47′” CROSS,
HOSAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE.
4. VEDAMURTHY.
No.49/4, FB MAIN ROAD,
BYRAVESI-IWARANAGAR.
BANGALORE–72. : ‘
(BY SRI.B.M.CHANDRASHEKARA, l7OAR’ R1)
1 A. 9′ ;
MFA FILED U /S 173(1) OF MV APEA’L”‘G_OMI?ItIG QN;.EQR§ADM.ISS1ON THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELWERED ‘THE’ EOLjLOwINcg-:
ThiS_–appeal’ ‘filed ‘by? the insurance company on the
Of Ofvfleldtnpensation awarded by the claims
by the judgment and award dated
;lS”‘S23.3.2001a in_M’vtC lNO.8’/I9/2007.
the learned counsel for the appellant and the
V’ Submit that they have amicably Settled the matter
Vfl”‘by_4’4agreeing for a total compensation of RS.1,63,O0O/- with
81°/0 interest from the date Of etition till the date of payment
as against the compensation of Rs.2,23,000/– awarded.–by the
claims Tribunal.
3. Accordingly, the above appeal is * _
The amount in deposit is direef;ed:_-Atoabée..iI’afisffii:tted»1.;o
the claims tribunal. The eIain?:ant_s afie-..e’m’.itIed'”iowitlidrawiL’
the entire amount.
akd*
