High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.P.G.R Diamonds vs Authorised Officer Under on 18 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
M/S.P.G.R Diamonds vs Authorised Officer Under on 18 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32995 of 2008(C)


1. M/S.P.G.R DIAMONDS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. AUTHORISED OFFICER UNDER
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.PRABIN BENNY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :18/11/2008

 O R D E R
        THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

          W.P.(C).No.32995 of 2008-C

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

   Dated this the 18th day of November, 2008.

                   JUDGMENT

The petitioner availed a loan and failed to repay

in time. The cash credit facility has grown with

accrual of interest and the transaction became

sticky and was classified as a non-performing

asset. Proceedings were initiated under Section

13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. That led to measure

under Section 13(4). This is under challenge.

There is no jurisdictional error or legal

infirmity pointed out in the impugned

proceedings. In fact, all that is requested is

that the petitioner may be granted some

instalments to pay off the outstandings.

Recording the said request and repelling all

other contentions and the right if any to

challenge the impugned proceedings before the DRT

WP(C)32995/08 -: 2 :-

or any other authority, this writ petition is

ordered directing that if the petitioner remits

an amount of Rs.7.5 lakhs on or before 15th

December, 2008, another sum of Rs.5 lakhs on or

before 15th January, 2009 and a further amount of

Rs.4 lakhs on or before 27th February, 2008 and

the remaining amounts on or before 27th March,

2009, the impugned proceedings will stand

deferred and ultimately dropped. On settlement

of the transaction as aforesaid, the bank will

do the needful to release the documents

immediately. If there is default in remitting

any of the instalments as aforesaid, the

benefits of this judgment will stand recalled

and the writ petition will stand dismissed

automatically enabling the respondents to

forthwith proceed with further distress action

without fresh notice to the petitioner.

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE.

Sha/201108