High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.Pooja Milk Foods Private Ltd vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 7 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
M/S.Pooja Milk Foods Private Ltd vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 7 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 29352 of 2008(T)


1. M/S.POOJA MILK FOODS PRIVATE LTD.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ASST.ENGINEER, O/O.ASSISTANT ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.N.GOPINATHAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :07/10/2008

 O R D E R
                          K.M. JOSEPH, J.

            ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                  W.P.(C) No. 29352 OF 2008 T
            ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
             Dated this the 7th day of October, 2008

                          J U D G M E N T

Briefly put the case of the petitioner is as follows.

Petitioner is a company engaged in the process of receiving

raw chilled milk, pasteurizing/processing, packing, storing and

distribution of milk and milk products in the State. Petitioner

has electric connection under Low Tension IV (Industrial)

Tariff. On 25.9.2008, the APTS, Palakkad, assessed the

petitioner and prepared Ext.P1 mahazar. It is stated in the

mahazar that 43.35 KV connected load is used for chilling of

milk. On 27.9.2008, petitioner came to be served with Ext.P2

notice and a provisional assessment bill demanding payment

of Rs.10,09,331/- on the basis of Ext.P3 gazette notification

the Tariff took change from LT IV to LT VII A. Petitioner filed

Ext.P4 objection before the 2nd respondent. He did not

consider the same. According to the petitioner, Ext.P3 is not

applicable to the petitioner as it is neither a dairy farm nor a

milk chilling plant but a milk processing plant. The case of the

WPC.29352/08
: 2 :

petitioner is that the petitioner is not informed about the

change of Tariff.

2. I heard learned standing counsel also.

3. I feel that the petitioner has a remedy of

approaching the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum,

Ernakulam. Accordingly, if the petitioner files a petition

before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Ernakulam

within three weeks from today, the Consumer Grievance

Redressal Forum, Ernakulam will consider the same and take

a decision with an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner,

within three months from the date of filing of the petition. In

the meantime, if the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.2 lakhs within

one month from today, the impugned proceedings will be kept

in abeyance till a decision is taken by the Consumer

Grievance Redressal Forum, Ernakulam.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
aks