High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.Psn Construction Equipment … vs The Intelligence Inspector on 26 February, 2008

Kerala High Court
M/S.Psn Construction Equipment … vs The Intelligence Inspector on 26 February, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 6134 of 2008(E)


1. M/S.PSN CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT PVT.LTD.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.J.ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :26/02/2008

 O R D E R
                           ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                         ===============

                      W.P.(C) NO. 6134 OF 2008 E

                    ====================


            Dated this the 26th day of February, 2008


                               J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is a registered dealer under the KVAT Act and

Ext.P1 is the certificate of registration. This writ petition has

been prompted on account of the detention of two consignments

as per Exts. P8 and P8(a). The irregularity noticed would suggest

that the respondent is suspecting evasion of duty for want of

documents accompanying the consignment. On the other hand,

the petitioner would submit that it being a dealer in heavy

equipments was only consigning these goods for replacement

purposes and that it does not involve any sale. It is also stated

by the petitioner that goods were accompanied by Exts.P6(a) and

P7(a) delivery notes. Petitioner is also referring to Ext.P7, a

certificate, which indicates that the goods were for warranty

replacement purposes and not for sale.

2. In view of this, I feel that though the irregularities

WPC 6134/08

:2 :

noticed in Exts.P8 and P8(a) needs to be enquired into, there is

no reason for detaining the goods any further.

3. Accordingly, I direct that on production of a copy of

this judgment and on the petitioner executing a bond without

sureties, respondent shall release the goods. Thereafter

adjudication will continue.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE.

Rp