M/S Pulsar Computers (P) Ltd vs Nil on 25 November, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAIKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25:'?! DAY OF NOVEMBER, 
BEFORE ' V

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE   .. 3

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.44.2__oF. 2609' "   'V  E. 

IN 1

COMPANY PET1'ri"c7Iv.«1§'<).39EOl+' 1995!  2   Q

BETWEEN:

M/S. PULSAR COMPUTERS L?) LTD.,_ {1}\'--.LE.(;N],
REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIOUIrAAfTOR,j'I  I 

HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA'; ._  I   
CORPORATE BHAVAN, 12%? EI.--O'OR; .RAHE;IA 'rOwERs,
NO.26~27, 1      
EANCALORE_~SSQ0:'31_,._»_ ~. 3     ...APPLICANT.

(SR1. DEE1?AK'A.'AT£\.H).I'2E)'18'  ESE COMPANIES {COURT} RULES, 1956 PRAYINC
TO"'eAPP_{)I1\I71.'3'AN AUDITOR TO AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF THE

 OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE HALF' YEAR ENDING 31-03-
A. 200.9 AND PIX HIS REMUNERATION AND TO PASS ORDERS AS
 THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 462(5) OF THE

N COMPANIES ACT, 1956. £1

R



2

'HflS CA CONHNG ON FOR ORDERS,1}HS DAY THE
COURTNMHNETHEFTKLOWHNG: .a

ORDER

Auditofs report is accepted

terms of the 0rd
No.21} /2007. The requirem

the Companies Act, is w;1″ch;T_ }
Company applicatieh ._i_s

Eie

zgpd
er dated 8–6– = T

er’1t_ under VSectie’f1};4-62(5:} of