Karnataka High Court
M/S Rajmahal Vilas Club vs The Commissioner For Commercial … on 2 July, 2009
IN THE' HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA A'? BAN§§;=§L4C2E§'E..&
DATED THIS THE 22% my OF JULYV:"2::()6'§:'~ A} % ' L
PRESENT L _ u_ V_
HONBLE MR.JUS'I'I(_3E v.{3:Q pALA dgizvm "
3 . ,
HON'BLE MR..J{.,jSTIss.,, 3:213. .M;--;1NV,...
2ND STAGE', §3FsNCiALORE~560G94
QEF' 1TSVHQN=. SEC5~§?ETARY.
V APPELLANT
(By ERAESANNA V R, AIDV.)
=3 " _'mE"%:it:>1§)£:s;5zss10;~1EI2 FOR
. Ci}.Fv1I${IE)l{ C'EAL TAXES
. GwE:.r;NMEN'r 09 KARNATAKA
{}{¥l\f.¥I)I:~£i NAGAR, BANGALORE--56Q 909
2 ;;;.:::_i71¢r ccammzssromm or COMMERCIAL
V 4_ TAXES (APPEALS) DVD I AND 111
BANC'xALORE-560 020
THE ASST COMMiSS1C}NER OF'
COMMERCIAL TAXES
{LUXURY TAX) -1, 3RD FLOOR
LAXMI COMPLEX, 1 MAIN ROM)
SESHADRIPURAM, BANRE-56o 920
W/
4 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
VEIBHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALOR!§2--01. _ _ .;"ivE:¢'1*ssu 2
(By sMT.GEETI~m MENC.%N, magi "
WRIT APPEAL FILED U/3,4 ora"'--*.:fm: KAE%Es3fxTg§.I{A £51614
coma'? ACT PRAYING TO SET 'ASIDE *'m;:_ ovgaaze'-'V .1:>..m;:1:>'V
21/ mzgoos PASSED IN THE wR1"m§>E;T;T1oN' ax: ";22524;;2oos,
IN w.A.No.3920/2005; . V' ' ' V
BETWEEN:
1 Bou:R1N:34I41~:%3fr1'm*rE _ -
19, ST. ROAD? " _
BANG-ALoRE.._3;:~.o'oo3_' " .
E€EPF€E'.SB§NTED"BY'F S'£..(;:RETA'RY . '
M_R,vENAKN?..sH RAG ~ APPELLANT
__ .{B599-:?:n,_mA1a?f§"v._A::.a:xL, ADV.)
1 _ «mg Ass1's*mm' <::oMM:ss;oNgR OF COMMERCIAL
TAXES ~ ._ V
2:4-m G1RCLE,'l"t§$aiiGALORE
. 3 OF'.FI*».';E~0F SALE STAX COMPLEX
_ {mi Iviam; WESHADRIPURAM
A 8~5N§3A§.i")RE 550 020
2 mag sir-ATE or KARN£s'I'AKA
REEPRESENTED BY
'sErI3RET,A1ga.,'g*3cz~wDA.J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A' 'A-dmziments is allowed and the documents are taken on
" record.
1 EMS CENTURY CLUB
REP BY yrs E~ION.SECF<'E'I'ARY
SR1 V 1, GANGADHAR V
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
NO 3., SHESHADRI ROAD: _ . = . _ }
BANGALORE660 001 ' V V. 1~'xPP'Ei,;i;A.N'1'
gay SM'I'.NEHA THAKUR PR§.:sAtij,'A1)i:zs.)
AND : " A '
1 THE STATEVOF KARNATAKA ,V V _..~
REP BY ITS F'1_NA1\§CE segsgmrggv -
VIDHANA
BANQAI;{;R£§_-VQ~.'1 ~
*m§::E:~s A{'I;UXUfE€'{ 'r;gx;..:,
BAN_GALQ:E?E._~2'(} . _* ...RESPONDENTS
2 THE A*ssi’3:%5m Cotfi:§€1s§1 oN§:R OF COMMERCIAL
(By us:wr.GE,¥:’rlé~1A’ MEA)
_ §VRIT””fi.i.?’P’E.Ai; I241;.Ei:>” ms 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH
cc:u;_R’r Ac’? pmmmc TO SET ASXDE THE GRDER DATED
J'{3DGhEEN’I’
‘.1142/2005 filed for producticm of aciditiomal
M/I
2. Heard the leameé Counsel for the
and Szxxtfleetha Menen, learned Additional
Advocate. _ I _ 3 T
3. Both the learned
issues invoived in these a.ppea1s”‘ are co!»:e19ejd,:’_by Tgtfie
decision rendered Appeal
N0s.38O2/2005.’. e/Win eeésa;3%,’ 3344/ 2005
disposed of
4, these appeals are
allowefl, : ‘
3d/é
Iuddé