IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 38098 of 2007(I)
1. M/S.SAKTHI RUBBER INDUSTRIES,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA.
... Respondent
2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR),
For Petitioner :SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :01/01/2008
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C) No. 38098 OF 2007 I
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 1st January, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner is in default of payment of sales tax dues as a result
of which revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated.
Thereupon steps have been taken under the Revenue Recovery Act
and Ext. P6 notice has been issued which shows that the tax due
from the petitioner itself is to the tune of Rs.3,33,608/-. In
addition to this interest and other charges are also due.
2. Petitioner does not contest the liability on merits, but
prayed for an instalment which has been turned down by Ext. P6 on
the ground that once the matter is reported for revenue recovery,
the respondents are incompetent to grant any such facility. It is in
these circumstances the writ petition has been filed praying for an
instalment facility for discharging the liability that is due from the
petitioner.
3. I heard the learned Govt. Pleader also in this matter.
WPC No. 38098/07 -2-
4. As already noticed, the petitioner is not disputing the
liability as such. All that the petitioner seeks is an instalment
facility to discharge the liability and to avoid revenue recovery
action.
5. Having regard to the limited relief that is sought for by the
petitioner and also taking into account the submissions made by the
learned Govt. Pleader, I dispose of this writ petition directing that
the amount due for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99 in
respect of which Ext. P6 revenue recovery notice has been issued
will be permitted to be paid in five equal monthly instalments. The
first instalment will be paid by the petitioner on 15.1.2008 and the
subsequent instalments will be payable on the 15th of every
succeeding month. Subject to payment as above, coercive action
against the petitioner shall be deferred and in default of payment
of any one of the instalments, the respondents will be free to
proceed against the petitioner.
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
jan/-