INUWHEHC@KUOFWmMWM%AT@W®%@E
DATED THIS THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER --2't3éf9._ '
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN, 'TfI}1§'l'{.C:E
THE HONBLE MR.JiJ_s'--1?1xCE'v;
WRIT A ¥_'PEAL
BETWEEN: 'A 'V
1 M/S SAMEER SALES vcoRP.QRAaT0'N«
PROPRIETOR j _ T A
"
S/ORALSI-IE.ED V '
AGED AIj3{'.3UT"22.YR.'3 fl
:.occ;1B'USI1\;EsS,E«.E% 1 T
R/AT.No.46'5., __ " __
BHQVICOLO-NY. "
BASAVE.SHVVAPA1'IAGAR,
. - BANGAL,oRE'--79-. APPELLANT
~ - _ '(By Snag"-1 R E1RA:)AR,'ADvocATE. )
THE CHIEF SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT
'JIIEHANA soumm
A : DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALOREBOI
2 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP BY FPS SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDI-IA,
BAN GALORE--O1
3 THE ADDL DIRECTOR GENE ' ~ ._ -6 « . ' 4
OF POLICE AND * A. '
INSPECTOR GENERALOF PRISONS,
NO.4, SHESHADRI RO'AD.,_V '
BANGALORE--O9 "
4 THE MANAG1NC:"D_1REC'TOn," ._
KARNATAKA STATE _CQNE3UM'EE2 ' _
CO--OPERATIVE FEDERA.'§'ION_,_ --- ' _
NO.4,PAMPAMA}LA.KA\r1 RO.AD','x . = '
CHAMAFAJPETEZ ' O
BANGALOE?'<';18'*¢ _ " _§;"RESPONDENTS
{By Sri:B1:'a$AXD¢§RAd Ogsf )
Is FILED U/S 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA'H1eHE«.COURfrV...ACT PRAYING 10 SET ASIDE
THE ORDER PASSED' IN THE. WRET PETITION
No.22149/2,009 ,DAT13,D' G7/O8/2009.
Txéiisx APP§3AL.__C.OMING UP FOR PRELIMINARY HEAIENG
. - Q§\§'THI:S"DA1?.«_ SABHAHI'I'J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING}:-
JUDGMENT
V 3 appeai is flied by the petitioner in
W.P.N0,_i-32149/2009 being aggrieved by the Order dated ‘
wherein the Iearned Single Judge has dismissed
\.5=
the writ petition permitting the petitioner to the
provisions of the prisons till 31.82009.
2. The appellant herein _fi1ed__
contending that he has entrusted :”the1’_”contra_ct’ of
vegetables, provisions and foo’d.~grains~ to the’..prisons in the.’
State as per the tender notification*..and expiry of
the term, the time petitioners are
required to supiliy prisons till
31.8.2009 the notifications
dated the Karnataka Co-
operative __ Cons!.;:nfe1*spp”I?e’deration has been permitted to
supply ‘food grains till 31.8.2009 and being
aggrieved biz this petition is filed seeking for
said order dated 107.2009 and circular
and to direct respondents 1 to 3 to call for
ten~d_ers_forV9supply of food~grains and other commodities for
the year” 2009 as per the provisions of the Karnataka
u”9.AA’1’ranuspareney in Public Procurement Act, 1999 Within a
x}
specified period and cailed for tenders district–wise the
su 1 of food– rains and issue suitable orders*’;in facts
of the case.
3. The impugned order had:”:.becn
before this court in W.P.No.i3l1E33x4/ and has!’
disposed of the same on recording:Vthevfistaternent
made by the learned Advocate that
interim arrangement the Work of
suppiying food in View of the
parliament would be operative
till immediate steps would be
taken for».calling– in accordance with law and
acco;rdingly,V thepwsaid writ petition disposed of with a
call for tenders after 31.8.2009, strictly in
A accordance wi’t31v”1aw.
0′ z4i.’A.1nV<\riew of the directions already issued in the said
order to cail for tenders after 31.8.2009, the appellant is at
to participate in the proceedings in accordance with
x}
law, after tender notification is issued and since
for which petitioner was permitted to supply ;.z_as
expired. question of issuing any further diT€Cti:(iI1'l net
arise.
Accordingly, the ‘writ _appeal«i’s_v’disposVec’i
above said directions.
cc ' ' . : .:' '.,Chie£ Ifisfice ksv** Index:Yes/Nev V' A
V. Web7:Hp_st: yes/’NU… ….. .. s