High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.Silverstream Plastics & … vs The Special Officer (Revnue) on 13 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
M/S.Silverstream Plastics & … vs The Special Officer (Revnue) on 13 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14234 of 2008(T)


1. M/S.SILVERSTREAM PLASTICS & CHEMICALS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVNUE)
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,

3. THE DEPUTY CHEIEF ENGINEER,

4. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.FIROZ

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :13/08/2008

 O R D E R
                K.M. JOSEPH, J.

  ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
       W.P.(C) No. 14234 OF 2008 T
  ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
  Dated this the 13th day of August, 2008

                J U D G M E N T

Prayers in the writ petition are as follows:

(i) call for the records leading to

Exts.P1, P3 and P4 notices and Ext.P8 order

and quash Exts.P3 and P4 and all the

proceedings leading to that and Ext.P8 order

by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other

appropriate writ direction or order;

(ii) direct the respondents to furnish

to the petitioner the details and calculation of

the demand covered by Ext.P4 by issuing a

writ of mandamus or any other appropriate

writ direction or order;

(iii) direct the respondents to refund

to the petitioner the amount paid by the

petitioner based on Ext.P3 demand by

issuing a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ direction or order; and

(iv) direct the respondents not to take

any disconnection steps pursuant to Exts.P4

and P8 issued by the 1st respondent by

issuing a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ direction or order.

WPC.14234/08
: 2 :

2. Learned standing counsel points out that the

petitioner has an effective alternate remedy by approaching

the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam. I feel

that the petitioner can be relegated to approach the

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam.

Accordingly, leaving open the contentions of the petitioner,

writ petition is disposed of relegating the petitioner to pursue

his remedy before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,

Ernakulam. If the petitioner approaches the Consumer

Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam with an application

pointing out his grievances within three weeks from today,

the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam will

consider the same and take appropriate decision in

accordance with law within three months from the date of

receipt of such application. Till such decision is taken by the

Forum, the interim order passed by this court will continue.

Sd/-

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
aks