. submitted that, the document cleariyestetiiishwthat, th1s’otV _
rating oeeotisninis right before the Laooor Court, the
V _ i ‘ ].:i,:”.’oriier”ieset and the matter is remittw to the Labour Court,
or disrmai subject to the management depositing
before the Labour Court within one month from the
the industry. In these circumstances, the management had no
opportunity to contest the matter.
5. Sri Leetakrishnan, teamed counsel appeerirtgvV.fi:r_r”‘»the
workman submittw that, notice was sent by registeretteoést’:
is returned as ‘not claimed’. in Saw, it is dmme_ci._to_j
served, considering the same, the awéitd
the workman is itiegat. Further thatt.
even proper notice or withetit”i-the in otriroirisions of
the industriat Disputes Act, that also the
workman is entitieoi roritdoackoroggf it
6. it is no ontoreoorr.o,ire ntanagement has not
oonteotw the metter;’,!t.r_ifssuon1itt_ed that. the industry is closed. in
this circuinetenoes, rrronotmiioo opportunity is required to be
given to the e..mat’3agen1ent to contest the matter, however, the
be put on terms.
this writ Petition is atiowed. The impugned