High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.Sun Shine Abodes Pvt.Ltd vs The State Of Kerala on 4 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
M/S.Sun Shine Abodes Pvt.Ltd vs The State Of Kerala on 4 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 6415 of 2010(B)


1. M/S.SUN SHINE ABODES PVT.LTD,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN,REP.BY

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CORPORATION OF

4. LALIYAMMA GEORGE W/O. XAVIER, LAXAN

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :04/03/2010

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                     ================
                 W.P.(C) NO. 6415 OF 2010 (B)
                =====================

             Dated this the 4th day of March, 2010

                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is a company which has purchased 1.32 acres of

land covered by Exts.P1 to P10 documents. According to the

petitioner, on 19/2/2010, certain persons under the leadership of

the 4th respondent trespassed into the aforesaid property of theirs

and attempted to cut open a drainage through the middle of the

property. Thereupon the petitioner filed Ext.P11 complaint to the

2nd respondent. According to the petitioner, 2nd respondent did not

take any action on the basis of Ext.P11 and petitioner apprehends

repetition of the incident and therefore this writ petition was filed.

2. The case was adjourned with a direction to the

standing counsel for the Corporation to obtain instructions in the

matter. On instructions, standing counsel submits that there is no

written consent from the petitioner authorising the Corporation to

proceed with any work through their property. It is stated that in

view of this, it has been decided not to continue the work of

constructing the drainage through the property of the petitioner

as originally proposed.

WPC No. 6415/10
:2 :

In view of the submission thus made, I feel the petitioner has

no reason to have any further apprehension in the matter.

Therefore, recording the submission of the standing counsel as

above, the writ petition is disposed of.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

Rp