Karnataka High Court
M/S. Target Video Games vs M/S,. Hotel Rajakamal … on 1 April, 2009
W 1 _,
IN THE max»: com? or mnnarmm AT mmnnoam
mmo THIS THE 1%' mm or APRIL, 2009
BEFORE " A
THE I~i0N'BLE MR..ms'rxcE 3.3. m;;fii; V ' 1%
WRIT PETITION 80.654-6
BETWEEN:
Ml $.Targ<=:t Video Games,
Shop No.9, at premises V
No.8] 1, 1'" Main Road, _T ;
Harekrishna Road, V '
Kuma1'aParkEasii,.-- _ -
Bangalore ~--~ 360 €_)01';,- . "
Represented by"':£é§ ' »
H.J.Siwani. V " V' ' PETITIONER
(By M] s I{Iuma:r'<'i:T.fKumar, ..Ads{s. ~ absent)
AND:
M] s.Ho$e1 Rajaikafinal . Enficrfiiises,
_ No.8] :15: Main Road_,_
East,
'-Bauga1om_»~'5@0'@o1,
R=::pix=:s_éniéé._«V33_§,?it;; Partner:
Mr'..A"r¢a,:a;.'raa:3..___ - RESPOHDENT
'kid?
_ 2 A. ,'I'1'3.is W1'i£ Petition is filed under Articles 226 <92; 227 0f the
.__£3'«:i'1::$t.if%;tion of India prayirzg to quash the order dated
_},'?.'-12'.*2%8 passed in O.S.No.6(}9'?/99 on the file of ma City
"Civil; Juciga at Bangalore {CCLH-28), Vick: An1:2::x11re:--F and
VT caflsequently allow I.AgNo.i2 filed by the petitioner.
This Petition coming on for Hearing this day,
the Clcsurt made the foliowingzm
..2..
ORDER
Though this matter is callvszd on three <:3c<:asi0ns,vfLi2§:'1*e. is
no mpresantation for the petitioner. Hence, the
dismissed for 110n~pr0se<:11tioI1.
PRES