High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S. Umiya Holdings Private Ltd vs The Registrar on 23 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
M/S. Umiya Holdings Private Ltd vs The Registrar on 23 September, 2010
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar


3 W W.P.3fi3E5!2616

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARI’-IATAKA AT BANGRLORE.

QATEO THIS THE 23″” QAY OF SEPTEMB% 2610
BEFORE

ms 1-!0N’BLE Mmusnce MQHAN _

1 ms. UMNA HOLDINGS PRNATELTD A
AGDMPANYINCORPDRATED %
uuna THE compmsas AOT’,”‘i&.5s’5,
REF*RE8ENTED8YlT$~.

macros Mr.ANiRUDDH-M Tsm

2 Mr.ANlRUDDlji «’M:Eif-lTA; _

we UMNAHGLQM3 mNA?E LTD

3 ms.aAu3:%AMEH*i*AT*. *~
DIRECTOR,’ %
ms smjm Hczwans PRNATE no

ALLAR;-j; R’:’AT 240.1075,
ceases.

HAz..2’*° a?A:3E,
INBIRANAGAR
amzmcns — we cos. PET!T!0N’ERS

3. ca, Mu.)

2 W.P.30’395i2910

*%

THE REGISTRAR
BANGALORE CITY CML AND
ESSKDN8 COURT

MAYO HALL

EANC-.’-Al_ORE

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE A 1
HIGH GROUNDS POLICE STATION, ‘
BANGALORE -. ”

(By Sri.S.B.SHAHAPUR,
mus WP. ss :=u.m a. my CJF

THE cousizmrréba T0 QUASH ALL
THE mocEgrssNGs%%%’éENn.:«fis%%L w cc NO- ssaswos
PENDING % gsscngétf-3 – ‘ HON’BLE 14*” ACMM,

mm,
» ‘Ms; on for preliminary heazing this day,

– tbs f§i!§mng:-

3 W.P.3939£’:!2Q3 9

QRQER

Heard tn: learned ccunso! for the petifimers and I31′-a_

teamed Govemmes1!Advowte.

2. The pefiticners have sought for

proceedings in C.C.Ne. pencfitifi an

ASMM, Bangalcre. b _ A T

3. Aworcing to the peiitifi:aii’e%§ ,»the
C.C.No.53336:2009 is missing: l:isbi to of
ham efforts, the me is not mg a;ci§j%aa%i:uatim, the
prose-mam in arfifiék» prcceaded

with. L
Hcruavor,””§:_1§ the potitimers is that the
*araxrtant,v..ui§’1’ivei*i is the Caurt beiow aminst the

to be exewted. Amen-ding to the

. petifiériétéé ‘tfié ‘§§i;;rr’a§£iiV.§tas mm print to missing cf the file.

4, “i:..i:?:$z subnitted on behaif of the pwumas that the

k may to go anaaa win: we matter by betting the

weaned. but me me is net being traced. Hance. mm

V5

4; W.E3D3$5l2O1¢

is hindrance in the matter. it is rumm brought to the notice at
the Com that the paitianers have filed an awlimiian unw

fiefion 3€39 C2r.P.C. for recalling the warrant on 15.09.20?-3~;.’j

However, the said applizxation is not put up before the ~ V.

the regwy of Ihfigfmate Coutt.

5. This Court does not mag Jié:LFW*’°

correctnaa car otherwise of the facts _msniiafie:I show,-..V tf”tnV£; V’

tile is rrfisplacsd and is not being ‘a Io’:’:gV.t’tiirsé$~, iii; fila
has to be recorzwuctod haseifi’-‘m The
court was is also atjibarty t;)_ M» complaint

from the with the matter in
accordance
If we pasitimr arm an applimfion for remlling the

have In be decided at an early date.

The Offiea at the Cam: should take care

that the i'[“:pzlié§fihzii is mad in the Regimy is put up nature the
. mgwm. ‘/9

5 W.P.1G395:231 0

Wm the above obsewatians. the writ petition is dspcsgd

d.

Hawever, me warrant imued aminfi the

flayed for a paiod of four weeks. _

dh*