M/S. Vastushilpa Constructions … vs Nil on 3 December, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 03rd DAY OF DECEMBER 2()10--"r._>

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N.   T'

COMPANY APPLICATION"NO'.'536'/25 Of  
COMPANY PETITION NO;88/ V1989   

B ETWEEN:

M/SVASTUSHIL-PA CON'STRU-fJ_'I?IONS»PV'1"'»»LTD., [IN
LIQUIDATION) V H"   j   ._
OFFICE OF THE:jO1_«'F1C.IAL' L1QU1OA1'O'R, 

HIGH COURT1'OF;KARN.--ATAKA    A 

  

12TH F1.LOOR,A'RAHE3JA TOWERS
No.26;-27'-M.G.ROADT,.  _ '
BANGALQRE--56Q    

 A ' " ...APPLICANT

[BY S--RI._K.S1r.cAHADE'arAN & SRI.V.JAYARAM ADVS. ,1

... RESPONDENT

C.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 462 OF THE

COMPANIES ACT, 1956, R/W RULES H[b) & 298 OF THE
COMPANIES (COURT) RULE, 1959 PRAYING TO
“APPOINTING AN AUDITOR TO AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF

/\~…

,2″

f

/

‘.0

THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDING
31.03.2010 AND FIX HIS REMUNERATION ETC,

THIS C.A. CoM1NG ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY}”–THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
0 R D E R

Audit report is accepted: and audito~1’–“s.O4:fe5cV

in terms of the order dated

No.21 1/ 2007. Requirernenf SV(§(31:i’i)nV the

Companies Act, 1956 wuith,.”

Comfiaifiy heféijyyvfilisposed of.

0 Sd/~
00000 JUDGE